What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision

A lot of people probably avoid discussions of the Brown case by now, having heard too much mention of it already and filing it under the "punditry" label. Certainly, that was my first reaction after first reading the title. Rest assured that this book is nothing of the sort--it is an academic effort at exploring how different understandings of the evils of racial segregation logically lead to different suggestions on how to remedy them. The masterfully written introductory chapters of the book acquaint the reader with the fundamental division of perspectives over the topic, how it may be seen to date back to Plessy v. Ferguson's sole dissenting opinion, and how different values and priorities lead to different "judicial" opinions. The opinions themselves, beyond exploring the outlined topic, do an additional service to the reader by reminding him or her of the oft-forgotten question of what role the Court itself should play in ameliorating the racial divide. Though one may well prefer an affirmative action policy, it still stands to question whether the Court, given its Constitutional restraints and responsibilities, should be the one to install it. In all, this is a great book for whoever is looking for the rationale behind the numerous opinions still present today regarding affirmative action and the racial discrimination question in general. I had to buy this book for class, but it is definitely one I will keep long after.