The War at Home: The Domestic Costs of Bush's Militarism

This book is nothing more than a re-hash of all the Leftist Socialist thinking that has been expounded since the early 1900's .The reason the book deserves 5*'s is not because I agree with what is presented;but because it covers all the worn out theories in such a concise manner. All one has to do ,is to look at what the results of having America and what she has accomplished in every way,from manyfacturing,maintaining world peace,advances in science,medicine,freedoms,agriculture and spreading prosperity around the world (particularly to those countries who are willing to accept these things) ;that by any measure that can imaginally applied,then it is readily seen tha America and her accomplishments have outstripped all others. The thinking that is expounded in this book, that America is evil and the solution is Socialism, has proved to be a catastrophic failure in most places where it got entrenched ,and continues to be put forth by the Left. Why this is the case can only be assumed to be that the left believe ,that the success of free enterprise,championed by America ,must be eliminated for Socialism to succeed.That thinking would mean that for failure to succeed,first success must be eliminated. All one has to do is look at the results of Sovialism,where it has been tried,and all that results ,is failure at its worst,or mediocracy at its best.In other words ,no "shining city on a hill" but instead a "gloomy valley of delusion". God Bless America and her concepts of Life,Liberty and The Pursuit of Happiness ;all which are just the opposite of Left Wing Socialism.

"The War at Home" by Frances Fox Piven is a sharp indictment of the Bush administration's neoconservative agenda. Cloaked in the righteousness of war, Ms. Piven argues that extremist elements within the Republican Party skilfully exploited the public's fears in order to further a radical domestic agenda. By demonstrating that this behavior flies in the face of history -- where war has often been a catalyst for increasing democratic rights at home -- Ms. Pivens believes the political Right has opened an opportunity for the Left to successfully challenge the status quo. The heart of Ms. Pivens' thesis is that the apparent irrationality of the Bush administration's foreign policy and the Iraq War in particular can be partly explained by the political advantage it has gained for Republicans at home. From exorbitant no-bid contracts for reconstruction in Iraq to huge outlays for defense and homeland security to a panoply of corporate tax cuts and deregulation, the war has proven to be a boon for corporate America. On the other hand, Ms. Pivens details how a host of social programs such welfare, meal assitance, unemployment insurance, health insurance and after school programs have been quietly cut or underfunded, thereby making the lives of many ordinary Americans more difficult than before. Interestingly, Ms. Pivens discusses differences within the Republican Party constituency to highlight some of the contradictions created by the Bush administration's policies. For example, deregulation is a key issue for the tobacco and gun industries, but increased spending on homeland security has significantly increased the regulatory function of government. Similarly, the mostly wealthy anti-tax crowd cannot help but be alarmed by the explosive growth of the federal deficit and the threat this may pose to the long-term health of the economy. The author suggests that the rallying effect created by the September 11 attacks cannot persist in holding these factions together and that fissures within the Republican base will soon become exposed. Of course, at the time of her writing in mid-2004 Ms. Pivens was hopeful that the people might reject Bush's bid for reelection. However, she anticipated the possibility that the Republican political machine might unabashedly exploit the public's fear of terrorism and propagandize a handful of deeply-flawed social initiatives in order to win, a prediction that sadly proved to be true. Yet, in my sole criticism of this book, she does not articulate a Leftist or Democratic agenda that might counterpose the far-Right Republican agenda. In my opinion, the Democrats must bear responsibility for its failure to oppose the war and to articulate a credible vision for America which has created a void that the Republicans have been only too happy to fill. Still, I think this book does a superb job of illuminating the highly destructive course that the Bush administration and its neoconservative policies have charted for our countr