The Rough Guide to Climate Change: The Symptoms, the Science, the Solutions

this book is so easy to read. i had to have the book for class but i ended up really enjoying reading it. we have assignments to read out of the book each week but i liked it so much i read the entire book in one night

Having just finished reading this book, I'm stunned at how much information it crams into ~326 pages. It's simply the most comprehensive and yet readable book on global warming today (clearly written with lots of photos and illustrations). I suspect that most readers (like myself) will have difficulty absorbing the material in one reading. Lucklily, the book is divided into sections that are independent (for the most part), so readers can break it into more manageable chunks. The author is clearly concerned about global warming but he strives to be fair and balanced- however, he does devote a page for a well-deserved critique of Michael Crichton's "State of Fear" (2005), which is really a silly book. Even though "Climate Change" was just published in 2006, much has changed because of the IPCC report in 2007, so a 2nd edition is due in early 2008.

It seems almost extravagant to publish yet another book on climate change. This one, however, bears the benefit of being almost extravagantly comprehensive. Henson has assembled a wealth of data, presenting it in a superbly organised and accessible account. Although the term "Rough Guide" might imply a superficial approach to the topic, this book is anything but that. In slightly over three hundred pages, the author covers the current conditions, the history leading up to those and what processes are in place to influence climate. He also deals with how the sciences investigating climate change work, and why we should pay attention to them. His analysis of policies addressing climate change, in particular his descripton of the Kyoto Protocols, is unsurpassed. He even includes how the arts, well and poorly, have adopted climate themes into their productions. Although he recognises the failings of such films as "The Day After Tomorrow", he accepts their role in raising public consciousness. This enlarged awareness has been manifested [...]which uses idle computers to assess data used in modelling climate change. Henson's explanation of computer modelling is on a par with the rest of his presentation; clear and informative. The author repeatedly stresses that while climate change is a global phenomenon, it is individuals who will make a difference in its onset and impact. Accordingly, his suggested solutions will bear close scrutiny. As well as Kyoto's broad view, Henson examines the alternatives or enhancements for their likely effectiveness. The recent initiative by The Asia-Pacific Partnership, based on voluntary controls and shared technologies, is covered, as is the Contraction and Convergence model. Most importantly, the author's coverage of personal changes in energy consumption and pollution reduction is very helpful. He makes clear that none of the steps requires drastic change in lifestyle nor the outlay of substantial funds. To this end he closes with a list of useful resources of information on all aspects of the topic. If there is a shortcoming in this book, it is the process used to save paper and money. The reduced size of the volume means packing all that information into a small space. The typeface is miniscule and the reading can be excruciating. Energy-saving lightbulbs in your house may lead to impaired vision from sifting through so much information. [stephen a. haines - Ottawa, Canada]

This book is well organized and well written. The subject of climate change is not an easy one, and here Robert Henson has given explanation that any thoughtful reader should be able to understand. Maps, graphs, and pictures help to give life to the text. Short biographies of some of the main participants in the debate about global warming are interesting and revealing. On a subject so important, the book is an important contribution to citizens who want to be better informed. The print is very small, so people with eye-strain need to be warned, but even for that part of the audience, there are sections of the text that can stand alone and still be interesting and informative.

Though small in size, this book is thorough and packed with the latest information about climate change. The margins are not overly generous. The typography is tight. The binding is excellent, with informative fold-out graphics on the front and back covers. A bargain price for such a well-edited, well-researched and well-constructed book. Although the book may be intended for the non-specialist, I would recommend that all university students of atmospheric sciences read this book. I will be recommending this book as a supplementary text in university courses -- a purpose probably not intended for this sort of book. The book is not mathematical. Nevertheless, many issues are raised that will invite formal mathematical analysis in the classroom. The book has some rough spots. Indeed the rough spots provide the invitations for a mathematical re-examination. page 16: "Even if we turned off every fuel-burning machine on earth tomorrow, climate modellers tell us that the world would warm at least another 0.5 C (0.9 F) as oceans slowly release the heat they've collected in recent decades." This should be stated as "...as oceans slowly warm and adjust toward the new radiative equilibrium state with higher greenhouse gas concentrations." page 100: "Even if we stopped emitting greenhouse gases tomorrow, we're committed to some amount of warming...as the heat tucked away from the deep oceans gradually seeps upward." This is the same mistake as on page 16. Even with CO2 fixed at the current 380 ppmv the oceans and atmosphere would warm for decades, with heat seeping downward into the oceans. The warming will be caused by more radiation entering the atmosphere than leaving. Another way to repair the sentence is to state: "Even if we returned greenhouse gases to preindustrial values tomorrow, we're committed to elevated temperatures for many decades...as the heat tucked away from the deep ocean gradually seeps upward." page 36: "...greenhouse gases carry several times more punch when they are emitted at altitude". The word should be "exist" rather than "emitted". The lifetime of a CO2 molecule in the atmosphere is a "century" (p. 24). And on page 29: "the gas should be well mixed throughout Earth's atmosphere". On page 172: "Longer-lived greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, are thoroughly mixed across the troposphere, both horizontally and vertically". For a greenhouse gas molecule that will exist in the atmosphere for 100 years, what difference does it make as to where it was released? page 166: "Nobody doubts the existence of the heat-island effect, by which dense buildings and paved areas of cities absorb heat and ricochet it through the the city air." A more rigorous explanation of the heat-island effect is warranted, preferably one that doesn't use the word "ricochet", and one that uses energy balance principles. The wikipedia has a decent summary of the physics. page 172: "Since ozone absorbs sunlight, its par