The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays

I read this book for a graduate seminar on the philosophy of art. The relationship that people have with language is an idea that philosophers who study "hermeneutical aesthetics" such as Hans-Georg Gadamer, have been exploring for decades. Gadamer, who was a student of Martin Heidegger, defines Hermeneutical aesthetics as not a theory of art per se, but more a set of practical guideposts for enhancing one's encounter with art. The goal of hermeneutical aesthetics is not to arrive at a concept of art but to deepen our experience of art. In hermeneutical aesthetics, theory is deployed to deepen contemplation of artworks by the audience rather than to categorize their nature. Thus, in the artform of literature, Gadamer's commitment to the linguistic nature of understanding also commits him to the view of understanding as essentially a matter of conceptual articulation between the author and the reader. This does not rule out the possibility of other modes of understanding, but it does give primacy to language and conceptuality in hermeneutic experience. Thus, Gadamer in his essay "On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth" in his book "The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays," agrees with Wimsatt and Beardsley who created the "Intentional Fallacy" notion that the "success" of a literary text is not to be found in the author's intent or motivations, but what has been communicated in the text itself. For Gadamer, a successful text has to answer the same question as any other form of communication. Is it successful in conveying "...the universal nature of all speech--namely, the fact that what the word evokes is there." For example, Gadamer in his essay "Composition and Interpretation" makes a hermeneutic distinction between the linguistic characteristic traits of people speaking to one another and what he calls "the experience of poetry," which he believes has its own "language." In regards to poetic language, Gadamer argues that when young lovers write poems we all understand that there are powerful emotional forces behind the intent of the poem and we do not have to ask about the author's intentions and motivations behind her verse. However, in regards to serious poetry, Gadamer argues that the reader does not question to whom or why the author is communicating. "The poem does not stand before us as a thing that someone employs to tell us something. It stands there equally independent of both the reader and poet. Detached from all intending, the word is complete in itself." Furthermore, Gadamer uses a unique argument for the importance of interpretation over authorial intent by hypothesizing that literary composition has a closer relationship with the practice of interpretation than any other artistic medium. "As far as poetry and poetic composition are concerned, it is not uncommon to find the practice of interpretation and artistic creation united in one and the same individual." One prominent poet that fit