The Killing Star

While looking for some hard science fiction I happened across THE KILLING STAR by Charles Pellagrino and George Zebrowski. This is hard science fiction at it's best. The novel comprises a number of cautionary tales and thumbs its nose at Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov.The book opens with relativistic bombs wiping out almost all life in the solar system. Relativistic bombs are missiles (just chunks of rock, really) that have been accelerated to a significant portion of the speed of light. Carl Sagan has stated that any advanced civilization that does not destroy itself becomes peaceful. THE KILLING STAR claims otherwise. I do not recommend this book to anyone that has paranoid tendencies. It is well written and frightening. So clearly frightening that it reminded me of THE HOT ZONE which is nonfiction.Most of the book follows the few survivors scattered across the solar system and their efforts to survive after the cataclysm. Many interesting scientific studies and theories are brought up muck like in a goor Arthur C. Clarke novel.So why do aliens try and wipe us out? Michael Jackson wrote a song about unity. Hordes of artists sang it. In 1985 every radio station on the planet broadcast it simultaneously. The song was We Are The World and the broadcast was the single "loudest" shout sent by us into space. Think about the song's message and the way it was broadcast. Read this book.

Although not a perfect book (character development is a little weak), it's a must-read for all fans of science-"faction". If an alien civilization wishes to do us harm, we stand no chance at all. This is not a cheerful story.

I read a lot. Quite frankly, most of what I read is trash. However, "The Killing Star" is one of a select few hard sci-fi novels I really, really, enjoyed. It is the only book I have read this year that I am still discussing with my friends. Get a buddy to read this book with you and the debate can be endless (i.e. a great choice for a sci-fi book club).The basic premise is that the search for extraterrestrial life (SETI) is frought with dangers. With some nicely done analogies and symbolism, the authors equate SETI to the the voyage of the TITANIC going full speed through fields of ice. Basically, the authors opine that any sufficiently advanced alien lifeform has no choice but to destroy any technologically advanced race it comes into contact with, so human beings should not be so eager to contact aliens by sending messages, radio communications, etc., into the deep reaches of unknown space. Why? Read the book. You will not be disapointed.

It tells you a lot about this writing team's skill when Charles Pellegrino and George Zebrowski can annihilate 99% of humanity in the opening pages of their THE KILLING STAR, and still keep their readers entranced for a whole novel. In fact, there are few writer's who could pull off such an audacious feat, then proceed to unleash some real emotional thrills and scientific mind benders to contemplate. Who are these faceless attackers? And why are they so bent on mankind's destruction? This novel keeps you guessing, and will keep you thinking long after reading it. The whole notion of alien "rules" and racial prejudice in the intergalactic neighborhood is a bit much for the mind to chew. Then add a dash of Pellegrino and Zebrowski's potent brew of scientific extrapolations of life in the not so distant future, fold in a couple of cast of characters that you are afraid to care for (knowing what fate must await them), and garnish liberally with ethical and moral accoutrements [Jurassic Park, step aside. What happens when you use the DNA from Jesus and Buddha to create them anew?]. A most fascinating meal for your mind that leaves you wanting to taste more

A realistic answer to Fermi's paradox: "Why are They Not Here?". A space-faring civilization will have ships travelling at a good fraction of the speed of light. Such ships pose a grave danger to any inhabited planet. Because of the high kinetic energies involved, such a ship would wipe out life on a planet, were it to collide with it. In other words, a star-travelling ship is indistinguishable from a planet-busting relativistic bomb. What would a rational civilization do, given this scenario? It would lay low, and pre-emptively strike against any new neighbor. The situation is not the same as the state of mutually assured destruction existent on our planet. The first relativistic strike is not traceable to the origin, and is likely to be decisive. The answer to Fermi's paradox? They are all hiding. As for the book, it has an audacious style, which I like very much. An action oriented book on a grand scale with solid technical underpinnings.