In this critical examination of recent accounts of the nature of science and of its justification given by Kuhn, Popper, Lakatos, Laudan, and Newton-Smith, Banner contends that models of scientific rationality which are used in criticism of religious beliefs are in fact often inadequate as
accounts of the nature of science. He argues that a realist philosophy of science both reflects the character of science and scientific justifications, and suggests...
Related Subjects
History Language Arts Philosophy Science Science & Math Science & Scientists Science & Technology