The Importance of the Electoral College

Do you know what the Electoral College is? Many Americans have probably "heard" of it, but most of them probably couldn't tell you what it's all about. In order to secure the rights of all citizens and to provide stability for the government, our Founding Fathers established the Constitution upon the basic principle not of simple majority democracy but Federalism. The Electoral College as the way to choose the Chief Executive of the nation, along with other checks and balances, was part of their plan to achieve their goal. This book explains the genius behind their plan and the history of how it has worked so well in the two hundred plus years since. However, there have always been those who have called for the abolition of the Electoral College and demanded the direct election of the President by popular vote. This was especially the case after the 2000 election when Al Gore won a slight majority of the popular vote but lost the Electoral College vote. Remember how the "Bush-Cheney" ticket was charged with being "Bush-Cheats" by the "Gore-Lieberman" campaign who was in turn identified as "Sore-Loserman"? Those who did not like the outcome of that election argued that the "will of the people" was somehow thwarted by the Electoral College and, therefore, that it should be abolished. That's akin to "don't like the message, so kill the messenger." While admitting that some small changes might help the Electoral College operate more in line with the will of the people, the author argues for the brilliance, wisdom, and continuing necessity of the Electoral College. I first heard Dr. George Grant at a homeschooling conference in Ohio many years ago. The director of the King's Meadow Study Center and Professor of Humanities at Franklin Classical School, he is not only an electrifying speaker but also an unusually incisive thinker who can easily get to the heart of a matter, lay everything out simply, and provide the evidence that leads to the proper conclusion. Three appendices give relevant information about the Electoral College from The Federalist Papers, the U. S. Constitution, and U. S. Code Provisions. Part of "The Witherspoon Series," The Importance of the Electoral College should be an essential part of every homeschooled student's study of American government, and is a must for everyone else interested in understanding and defending the unique system of elections bequeathed to us by our Founding Fathers.

Remember the American Presidential election of 2000? Almost any other country, almost any other time-period, almost any other bid for power, and you would have had civil wars, kidnappings, stealthy assassination by poisoning, palace intrigue, a military coup, a foreign invasion, or something neat. Shakespeare could have written a tragedy or Sir Walter Scott could have penned a great romance about the event. Historians could have written histories that read like mysteries. Mystery writers could have written fiction that read like history. But the American political system is unbelievably dull. With hanging chads and pregnant chads being the prime suspects, not even the fictional talents of a John Grisham or a Dan Rather could make this American story anything but dull. Buttressing this dull political system is an antiquated, almost Medieval, reactionary, pre-Civil War, 18th century concoction of a committee called the Electoral College. It is of this institution that George Grant has written his latest book The Importance of the Electoral College. In spite of the dullness of the subject, the supposed obsolescence of the system, and the nature of the critics and the criticisms, the Electoral College is important. The Electoral College, not the will of the majority or even plurality of voters, put George Bush in the White House four years ago. Back in 2000, the claim of Mr. Gore and his supporters was that they won over a million more votes nationwide than Bush and were the rightful intended recipients of more votes in Florida. The will of the people was somehow thwarted, so the Gore supporters claim. Still the issue revolved not around the millions of votes cast, but the 270 electoral votes. Was this a travesty of democracy? "Bush won 29 states to Gore's 21. Bush won 2,436 counties but Gore received majorities in only 676. Bush won regions covering approximately 2,432,456 square miles of the nation while Gore won in 575,184." (p. 43) A Gore Presidency would have largely represented only a few densely populated clusters along the coasts as opposed to Bush's broader appeal. Of course, it is easy to defend the Electoral College when my candidate wins. The question still remains, is this the best system? After all, a candidate could win the White House by winning the 11 most populous states by one vote each even if he lost the other 39 states and the District of Columbia by 99% margins. Dr. Grant provides three major lines of reasoning in supporting the Electoral College. First, the system works. Even with at least 14 of the 43 Presidents being elected without a popular majority, the system has worked in providing an adequate means of determining a winner in Presidential races. Even in cases, such as 1800, 1824, and 1876, when the system was subjected to questionable political tampering, it was not the Electoral College that was the issue. Rather, there were political forces at work outside the system that created the tension