The Eureka Effect: The Art and Logic of Breakthrough Thinking

I saw this book for the first time while browsing the science section at a bookstore. I decided to purchase this book because I rather ironically just had a "Eureka" moment of my own and noticed that not only was I able to develop a solution to the problem that I had but I also noticed that my thinking overall permanently. This book helped me to understand it. Perkins explains each stage of the eureka moment and what holds people back at each moment. Other reviewers did a fine job explaining the merits of the book so there's no need to be repititive. Worth the purchase is what I would say. Why only four stars? I believe the Eureka effect can be a learned behavior, like anything else in life and I wish there had been more explanation on how to recreate that state of mind. In it's essence, it's a very simple process: 1) persist in discovering a solution while not being limited by restrictions which truly don't exist, 2) rest your brain. 3) An answer will eventually come. Simple yes, but surely since the process is known on a basic level, improvements can be made. For example, what is different about the person who continuosly "gets" things versus the person who "gets" things occassionally? I was expecting this book to go beyond explanation and into instruction.

Very enjoyable read and useful information for companies and people engaged in creative activities. Presents interesting research and great content regarding innovation. Perkins' style is well-suited to general audiences and he provides good references for more technically demanding readers. I highly recommend this book.

I have read many books on problem solving and breakthrough thinking. This is by far the most accessible. David Perkins is co-director of "Project Zero", an educational research group at Harvard Graduate School. He has a PhD in mathematics and artificial intelligence from MIT, so he is very qualified to be writing on this subject.Perkins covers a lot of ground in this book and manages to explain his theory of problem solving from many different aspects using varied problems and examples.The title refers to Archimedes and his breakthrough discovery of the displacement of water to calculate volume. This is the first example, which is drawn from this near mythological event. Perkins continues to delve deeper into how breakthroughs in thinking occur.He outlines a series of steps that he believes are key to breakthrough thinking. These are abstracted from many different examples of breakthrough thinking. (Long Search, Little Apparent Progress, Precipitating Event, Cognitive Snap, Transformation).From certain aspects this is the easy part, defining a set of steps that seem to be common in breakthroughs. The interesting part for a reader will be, can Perkins describe a series of steps that can define how the mind can actually achieve breakthroughs? Defining the steps always seems reminiscent of seeing the instructions for tying a bow tie, steps 1 to 4 seem reasonable, and then suddenly in step 5 you have a tied bow tie. But how do you get from step 4 to step 5 is always left a mystery that needs to be worked out. Obviously with a little fiddling, and knowing the end result, tying a bow tie, is a breakthrough that most people can achieve. But how to get from precipitating event to cognitive snap (or Eureka) is a little trickier to define. Is there really a series of steps to achieve breakthroughs?Perkins spends the rest of the book, delving deeper and exploring this subject. He tackles some of the common pitfalls of thinking that can hamper someone's ability to solve a problem. Breakthrough problems by their very nature need to breakthrough current assumptions and thought patterns. Perkins uses the analogy of the Klondike gold rush to explore the principles further. How do you find a small amount of gold in a large area? Perkins feels this is analogous to finding solutions to breakthrough problems. He describes some common pitfalls, using this analogy (Wilderness of Possibilities, Clueless Plateau, Narrow canyon of exploration, Oasis of False Hope).Perkins uses many puzzle examples throughout the book. Some of the puzzles are old, but still useful to explore. He defines the different kinds of puzzles, the ones that can be solved by a linear progression of thought, and then the second kind that needs a breakthrough in thinking (not always on a large scale), this is where linear logical progression will not reveal the answer. He uses the pitfalls as defined and shows how each of them can side track the puzzler from finding the solution.At first, the nature

I never read "science" books. I bought the book because when I think "breakthrough thinking" I think about transformational work. I was pleasantly surprised to find out a lot of cool things about problem solving that I had never considered before.Yes, he gets scientific in the end, and the book doesn't quite flow, but, on the other hand I gained a perspective on why my life sometimes goes through bumps and spurts, and have gained valuable information in my daily troubleshooting life.

The other two reviewers missed the whole point of the book. This is a well balanced book of problem solving theory, and practical examples. "The Klondike", is a good model to explain why people have trouble solving difficult problems. Yes, I have found some of this material in other books. However, I think this is presented in a more understandable and cohesive manner. I do agree with the other reviewers the book does not end well. But the first 80% is money well spent.