The Constitution and Criminal Procedure: First Principles

Professor Amar has written a fine book in, "The Constitution and Criminal Procedure". Overly thin - the critical elements are included, but, not particularly helpful. Written 11 years ago, it's somewhat out of date. Tends to read the constitution in much more literal and original terms than most defense attorneys. Okay. I wish that it had been more comprehensive and thoughtful. I'd give this a solid B. I'd recommend reading some of the newer and more comprehensive and better researched texts.

Akhil Amar, a distinguished law professor at Yale University, has written a very accessible book that discusses what's wrong with criminal procedure today.Most people tend to think that the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments protect the guilty far more than society. For example, under the Exclusionary Rule, courts must suppress evidence that is obtained unlawfully, even if the suppression results in letting criminals free. (Studies show that in reality, the percentage of cases in which criminals escape prosecution on technicalities is quite low.) Notwithstanding the cries of the ACLU and other defenders of criminal rights (such as Alan Dershowitz), most people probably think this system is crazy.Professor Amar explains why a common sense approach is in fact the best way to interpret these constitutional rights. His analysis involves both a plain reading of the language of the Amendments (a textual approach) as well as the historical understanding of these rights (a Framers' intent approach). Both ways of looking at the issue confirm his belief that the Supreme Court has made a number of wrong turns throughout the years.Lay persons will not find this book too difficult or theoretical.