The Civil War Chronicle: The Only Day-By-Day Portrait of America's Tragic Conflict as Told by Soldiers, Journalists, Politicians, Farmers, Nurs

I probably passed over this book a dozen times or more, tempted to buy it, and thinking that Gallman had only covered ground that I was already covered before by Henry Steele Commager in "The Blue and the Grey", and in books like Harwell's Union and Confederate Readers. I am pleased to say that I was wrong. When I finally broke down and got this book, I was going through a particularly rough period in my life, a family move, and the downsizing of a large personal History Library. In fact, it was during one of my visits to my parents when I picked up the book, and have pretty much not put it down as there is always something new in it. For me, what was particularly interesting was the accounts by both Union and Confederate officers about James Harrison Wilson's cavalry invasion of Alabama at the end of the war, and how his forces decisively defeated Nathan Bedford Forrest outside of Selma, just days before Appomattox. The account by Union General Eli Long has the flavor of a dispatch written just after the smoke of battle had cleared. Since Wilson's Raid was all but obscured by the great drama taking place at the same time up in Virginia, first-hand writings of the campaign are made even more valuable, and Gallman's got two fine ones here. But there is something for everyone in Gallman's work; The New York Draft Riots, the carnage at Gettysburg, also seen from both sides, Sherman's March to the Sea and its effect on the Southern Civilian population; how Slaves found refugee on Union-held islands off the Carolina Coast; and a vignette about the appearance and the character of George Custer. What not to expect is a thorough history of the war. There are countless other accounts available, including Commager's. But to get an idea what soldiers and civilians on both sides felt - and more importantly jotted down at the time, this book cannot be beat. I even liked Eric Foner's influence on locating passages on the Black Experience and Reconstruction, written from the standpoint of those who experienced it, though I could care less for Foner's Leftist politics. Some of the other reviewers felt it was missing vital pieces of the Civil War puzzle, I don't, but also advise the reader that this is a good starting point for personal accounts. Other works such as James McPherson's "Battle Cry of Freedom", the " Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant" , "Recollections of Robert E. Lee", and Sandburg's biography of Lincoln, not to mention "Hardtack and Coffee" by Billings, Burke Davis' "Civil War: Strange and Fascinating Facts" and Philip Van Doren Stern's "Secret Missions of the Civil War".

I originally thought this book would be the Civil War equivalent to Stephen Ambrose's Citizen Soldier. The topic is the same (the "common person"'s experiences in the war) but it is a compleatly different format.This book is a portable archive from the civil war. Instead of being a narrative description of the civil war as seen by "common folk" it allows these charaters to speak for themselves through letters, diaries, and a variety of correspondance. Lots of photos. I live too far away to visit a Civil war museum - this is the next best thing. You can draw your own inferences and interpretations from the letters and orders. Some are eye openning and show how times have changed; others show how similar these folks were to the 21st century folk.Book is well worth owning!

It's been called the first modern war. Mechanized infantry movements, electronic communication, rifled barrels, ironclad battleships, and submarine warfare were all introduced to the world in the American Civil War. But it was also the first war to be covered in detail by modern media. A rich photographic, journalistic, and personally documented legacy has been left behind by the participants and observers. With The Civil War Chronicle, a detailed historical effort has been made to offer these primary sources to the public in a chronological fashion. The benefits of offering data this way, along with appropriate commentary, is immediately evident to the Civil War buff. But even those with a passing interest in the drama will find plenty to feast on. Within the book's pages lies a wealth of photos, newspaper stories, letters, and diary entries. The famous and the not so famous alike have gripping, first hand stories which speak across the years to future generations. Many were aware of the historical significance of their times, and took great pains to record events for posterity. Other sources, more partisan in nature, took biased pains in illustrating their case to the detriment of the opposing side. What I particularly enjoyed was the ease of reading the book proffered. It is very well laid out, with a two column approach that allows neat separation of articles, ideas, and dates. The illustrations chosen are well placed, and everything is broken up into easy to read chunks. In the interest of space and reader attention, the editor chose to cut out certain portions of several articles. I can understand the need for this, but I was left wondering about the omitted parts at times. Such is inevitable for the casual reader; I suppose to get it all I would have to devote the years of research that went into this book.The Chronicle stretches from November, 1860, when Lincoln won his first election despite the fact he did not win the popular vote (something which is ironically resonant today) to May, 1865 when the New York Times declared, "Peace at last." All told, this is a wonderful book, and J. Matthew Gallman will be greatly appreciated for offering this fine new entry in the line of Civil War literary efforts.