The Americans at D-Day: The American Experience at the Normandy Invasion

Very interesting accounts of D-DAY. I enjoyed this very much-like the way the author writes on this account-puts the reader in the battle scenes with personal attachment-can not put this book down once I started to read it. Very good- highly recomend this to all interested in WW II history at Normandy and D-DAY.

I found this book to be a very informative and accurate account of the events leading up to D-Day as well as the actions of the American forces involved. This book dealt only with American landings at Omaha and Utah beaches as well as the airborne drops behind the Nazi lines by glider troops, airborne troops and the pathfinders. However the author did not completely ignore the actions of British and Canadian troops who participated either. Their objectives and contributions to the overall success of the invasion is mentioned throughout the book as well. British and Canadian troops were able to take command of key bridges and causeways that day in effect cutting off a German mechanized counterattack. Complete with maps showing troop movements and objectives, the author painted a picture of the many trials and tribulations of that historic day. Each chapter is a story within itself that comes together page by page. At some points I found myself flipping back and forth just to try and keep up with the different names, platoons, regiments, etc. so that I could tie them altogether as McManus did. I was also impressed with the way the author pointed out the American mistakes that were made as well as the German mistakes that American forces took advantage of. Very often superior German forces were fought off or held back by outnumbered American platoons using subterfuge or sheer will to make their numbers appear larger than they in fact were. McManus also points out that American casualties on that day could have been lessened with a more precise Aerial attack and bombardment which at the time was not a part of military planning (close air support combined with ground troops attacking.) The Navy really stepped up that day with their bombardments to make the beach landings a success. The entire day was a combined effort of sheer will, courage and commitment to the cause. The use of imagery and paying close attention to detail makes this book a must read for anyone interested or learning about the subject of World War II history.

"The Americans at D-Day" by John McManus is a solid read within the plethora of books out there (especially published in the last few years) dedicated to D-Day. McManus writes with a clear easy-to-read style that helps to make "The Americans at D-Day" quite enjoyable. If you have never read a book on D-Day, this is a book that can provide a nice introduction. Of course be aware that McManus' book deals entirely with American operations relative to Overlord. If a reader wants a more encompassing look at how the Allies as a WHOLE breached "Fortress Europe" they should seek other works; such as Cornelius Ryan's "The Longest Day", Max Hastings' "Overlord: D-Day and the Battle for Normandy", or John Keegan's "Six Armies in Normandy", to name a few.Nitty-gritty: One of the most positive aspects of "The Americans at D-Day" is its organization. McManus separates the book into two major parts: Planning and pre-invasion (Part1) and the invasion itself (Part 2). Within each of these major sections he establishes several sub-sections that describe particular aspects. For example, the role of US Army Air Forces in strategic and support bombing and fighter cover are described both from the angle of planning (the Transportation Plan discussion in Part 1 of the book) and outcomes (Air Cover in Part 2). Thus, one gets a feel for how things were envisioned as well as the realities of their implementation. About 1/3 of the book is dedicated to Part 1, while the remainder is given to Part 2. In Part 2 each "branch" (or sub-branch in case of US Army units) of the US military is given it's own due. This is a nice change from the typically simple chronological re-telling oft seen in other D-Day book. In doing this McManus is able to clearly show how each branch/sub-branch contributed significantly to the outcome of D-Day, in some cases less than expected (e.g., Transportation Plan), in others more (e.g., US Navy fire support of beach landings). Within each of these sub-sections the story is however generally chronological and thus the reader does not lose the temporal context. McManus should be applauded for this approach to his storytelling. I found "The Americans at D-Day" extremely easy to read and remember because of this organization. Is there only praise for "The Americans at D-Day"? No. McManus has crafted a very readable and historically sound story, yet little is particularly new. A read of "The Longest Day" and/or "D-Day: The Climatic Battle of WWII" (S. Ambrose) and any reader of "The Americans at D-Day" will be convinced of this. McManus is gracious in giving credit to HISTORIANS who've written on D-Day with clarity in the past (notably Ambrose and Hastings). Yet, McManus "borrows" quite liberally (don't read plagiarize here, rather re-telling of stories told elsewhere with little new enlightenment) from works of Cornelius Ryan (see "The Longest Day") and Mark Bando (see "Vanguard of the Crusade: The 101st Airborne Division in WWII") wi