Self-made Man and His Undoing

Once characterised as the "tool-making" ape, human beings have shown an astounding propensity for technology. We unconsciously deal with technology every day, thinking we know its definition. We communicate instantly, pay debts electronically, and even post book reviews that millions can read. Jonathan Kingdon takes a deeper view of "technology". He considers it differently, suggesting "stones", "spears" and "fire" are more meaningful in our heritage than is electronics. It has, he contends, allowed our species to spread across the globe into every habitable niche. It also allows us to engage in a level of destructiveness unmatched by any other creature. The evolutionary roots of this behaviour are thoughtfully explained and rendered in this excellent study. According to Kingdon, our use of technology helped drive our own evolution in ways Darwin never envisioned. The use of spears helped spur our exodus out of Africa in search of new food prey. Walking upright made the task increasingly easy. Shattered stones, shaped for precise use, became food processors - devices no leopard had at its disposal. Our prominent canine teeth, no longer needed, were reduced in size. Fire, that fearsome affair on savannah or woodland, was tamed to provide foods more easily and effectively digested. Our stomachs declined in size while the added proteins enhanced our brain. Fire also likely shaped our early social arrangements, bringing together the foundations of the kind of groups we're familiar with today. Physical attributes responded to changes in habitat, diet and environment. The human face, drastically changed from its earlier primate visage. The human skull, once thickly ridged in our precursors, developed thinner bones, allowing changes in eye movement, extended our nose even as the capacity to detect smells declined. Our noses are more likely the result of needing to take in more air while moving or respiring in hot climates. Less chewing of food reduced the need for heavy jaw muscles, giving the brow more flexibility. Our expanding brains thus found room to grow. You can watch the process with every newborn child. Food - its finding, gathering and processing - is the pivot for much of our development. Kingdon shows how the quest for food led to our emigration along traceable paths - riverine valleys, forested shorelines and wooded [but not forested] areas. The route of migration out of Africa followed a "Southern Route" along Arabia, India and into Southeast Asia. The recent find of Homo floresienses shows how diverse that movement could make us. We learned to follow animal tracks to water where prey resided, which also improved our bipedal capability. Extended range became increasingly the norm, but while it was once to our advantage, in today's world it foreshadows disaster. The earliest indication what the future would bring was the Australia-Pacific region. It's only become known in recent years that the Island Continent

Jonathan Kingdon is an English biologist who was born and raised in Kenya. He is an expert on East African animals, including that most fearsome of African-born predators, man. Here he examines human evolution, especially the relatively recent diversification of our species into countless ethnic groups. How did the major races originate? And what role did tool-making play in our evolution? Kingdon is inspired by a deep love of human variability, as his lovely pencil drawings of the people he has encountered around the world make clear. Everybody talks about "celebrating diversity" these days, but in practice that usually means the opposite: trying to prevent anybody from noticing the kaleidoscopic biodiversity of the human race. Kingdon dissents from this anti-knowlege, anti-human dogma.One of his most interesting speculations is that modern black Africans (as opposed to the older, lighter-skinned aboriginal pygmies and bushmen) actually originated outside Africa. He believes that modern humans first originated in Africa, then spread throughout the Old World. These were probably brown rather than black in color, because most people don't need the extreme degree of sun resistance that black skin provides -- only mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun. Everybody else has enough sense to take a siesta when the sun is high. However, one lifestyle would require tremendous sun-resistance: beachcombing. Collecting clams, fish, and other water's edge life requires being out in the sun whenever low tide occurs. Kingdon hypothesizes that around the Indian Ocean a race of beachcombers became adapted via natural selection to the sun, then returned to conquer Africa and drive the native pygmies, bushmen, and hottentots into the margins of Africa. In support, he cites the odd fact that small remant populations of very black African-looking people are found here and there many thousands of miles to the east of Africa: e.g., the "negritoes" of the Maldive Islands (south of Calcutta), Malaysia, and the Phillipines, as well as the larger blacks of Melanesia in the Pacific. There is little archaeological evidence to support this theory, but that would not be surprising since ocean levels are much higher today than during the Ice Ages. Hopefully, the Human Genome Diversity Project lead by Cavalli-Sforza will produce definitive evidence pro or con on this ingenious but currently far-from-proven notion.Steve Sailer