Re-Envisioning Psychology: Moral Dimensions of Theory and Practice

Richardson, Fowers, and Guignon present a quite readable and fantastic critique of prevailing assumptions and problematics in psychology. They also present a wonderful hermenetically-inspired alternative to the problematic paradigm. My only critique of this critique is that they do not go far enough in presenting applications (especially for clinical psychology) of the alternative conceptualization. I recommend that any interested in alternative perspectives on the prevailing linear, deterministic paradigm in psychology purchase a copy of this book.

Richardson, Fowers, and Guigon present a readable piece of apt criticism for psychology. Like many other philosophers of social science and laypersons, RFG contend that mainstream psychology has relied inappropriately on the methodology of the natural sciences in an effort to gain prestige. Consequently, psychology simply perpetuates current sociocultural understandings of psychological phenomena as scientific facts. The problems inherent in this approach are illustrated with a fascinating review of research on aggression and marital therapy, respectively. A hermeneutic alternative to psychological inquiry is provided. Beautifully written! It is also respectful criticism. An important piece for a field that is unwilling to admit the role of moral, political, and economic influences on its findings.