Rabble in Arms

I thoroughly enjoyed "Rabble in Arms" and its sister novel, "Arundel." The characters come alive, there is much to learn about the Revolution, and I for one enjoyed Roberts' occasional meditations on the nature of war and the pros and cons of certain historical figures. I won't detail the contents of the book because others have done that already on this site, but will say that no one can read these books and not come away with an appreciation what the men (and women!) who fought on our behalf in the Revolution did for us. There is a "however," however... Roberts is terribly pro-Benedict Arnold, to an unreasonable degree. I wonder if that wasn't simply to add interest to his book - by giving us an alternate Arnold as a counterweight to one of history's most notorious traitors, he does add an intriguing element to his novel that draws the reader in. The Arnold he produces is seductive, a "prodigy" of great military skill and selfless honor. Arnold, Roberts would have us believe, only turned traitor to save the colonies from French domination (a viewpoint he pushes heavily in his other Revolutionary War novel, "Oliver Wiswell.") Roberts reports Arnold was despised and ill-treated beyond all reason by mediocre fellow officers and Congress out of jealousy... and yet, high-minded principle was the only reason he defected. Now, I spent only a few minutes on the Internet reading up on Arnold to learn a few things that do not jibe with Roberts' view of him: for example, one might well wonder if it was true that Arnold was so ill-used. It's probably true that Arnold was deprived of proper credit for the victory at Saratoga by his commanding general, Gates. And its true he had his share of enemies. But the fact remains, Arnold DID receieve the rank of Major General from Congress, and DID receive the prestigious command of Philadelphia after his leg injury at Saratoga made it impossible to continue field command without extensive recuperation. While at Philadelphia, he was court martialed on a number of charges Roberts considers trumped up: but it IS true that Arnold spent beyond his means on lavish parties he was holding to socialize with Philadelphia's largely loyalist elite. The core charges that stuck against him involved misusing government property to further his social life. The upshot was that Arnold was given a symbolic slap on the wrist by Congress, in the form of a letter of reprimand written by Washington that read more like a thank you note for Arnold's brilliant service than a condemnation. So much for "abuse." Arnold's inappropriate fraternization with Loyalists in Philadelphia led to his second marriage... predictably enough, to a Loyalist. His lavish spending left him deeply in debt. It may be that Roberts is correct that Arnold's decision to sell out West Point to the British for the equivalent of millions of modern dollars was motivated only by high-minded, anti-French principles (Roberts never mentions the Arnold had

Rabble in Arms is wonderful, and Kenneth Roberts, in only his second novel, demonstrates an amazing command of the medium. The author's keen appreciation of the historical context is critical to the novel's content, but it is his skill at developing characters, fictional and historical, that gives the book its great vitality.Comparing Rabble in Arms to Arundel misses the point. They are, for all their shared themes and characters, different books. Simply put, Peter Merrill's voice and perspective in this novel differ in many respects from those of Steven Nason in Arundel. Cap Huff, who returns as the errant knight, is integral: he is to Roberts as Falstaff is to Shakepeare. I do recommend reading Arundel first, since you will derive extra benefit from the character development that has already taken place in the first installment of this series.Rabble in Arms is another great work by a very talented and prolific author. Perhaps Roberts' sympathetic treatment of Benedict Arnold and his ambivalence concerning patriotism and loyalty have kept his work out of the classroom. Whatever the reasons, it is tragic that Roberts and his novels are not better known. They deserve to be widely read.

I have read "Rabble In Arms" several times and have liked it better each time I (re)-read it. Many years ago as a midshipman at the U.S. Naval Academy I wrote a paper about the naval battle of Valcour Island, fought by the Continental northern army under Benedict Arnold against the British on October 11, 1776. While Arnold's small fleet was defeated and almost totally wiped out, the strategic importance of the battle cannot be overstated. This is because Arnold succeeded in forcing the British to forego until 1777 their plan of moving down Lake Champlain and Lake George to link up with another force moving up the Hudson, cutting New England off from the rest of the Colonies. When the British did move south in 1777, they were defeated and forced to surrender at the Battle of Saratoga, and it was this battle that convinced the French to join with the Revolutionary forces to fight against the British. Kenneth Roberts' history is exact, and in fact his researches made clear some very fundimental but unknown facts about the Battle of Valcour Island. This is an outstanding book!

I first read this book, along with all the other books this author wrote, back in 1960 and 1961 and wrote a term paper on this author's works. Book reviews contemporary with the writing of Kenneth Roberts' novels noted that there was more history packed into each of his novels than in an entire college course or two. The book describes actual historical events through the eyes of several colorful fictional characters. This novel describes the birth of the United States Navy, where, in 1776, the American Colonists under command of General Benedict Arnold built a fleet of ships in Skenesborough (now Whitehall) at the foot of Lake Champlain. It describes the subsequent battle of Valcour Island, where this tiny fleet of ships took on a much larger British force sailing south on Lake Champlain enroute from Canada to Albany. Although the American Fleet was eventually dispersed, this first US Navy successfully delayed the British by a year in their march to the south. This year allowed the Americans to recruit a large enough army to defeat Burgoyne's British Army at Saratoga. This book tells the stories of Jennie (or Jane) McCrea's massacre by the indian allies of the British, the use of the story of her massacre to encourage enlistments throughout New York and New England, the massing of Rebel forces at Saratoga, and the defeat of General Burgoyne's Army at Saratoga. It also covers to a degree the battle of Oriskany, which halted the advance of Col. Barry St. Leger who was advancing down the Mohawk Valley from the west, with the intent to join forces with Burgoyne at Albany. During one winter, it delves into the lives of the western Indians who allied themselves with the British. It does all this in a very entertaining way. I found it to be a very enjoyable way to learn a great deal about the history of the American Revolution in the Champlain, Hudson, and Mohawk Valleys of upstate New York. I am purchasing this book to read it again for perhaps the fifth or sixth time.

Having first read this book 30 years ago, I was pleased to discover I loved it even more the second time around. Funny, moving, romantic, and historically accurate, Rabble in Arms reveals the political intrigue and pettiness that characterized the Continental Congress, derailed Benedict Arnold's military career, and led (in part) to his treason. I recommend first reading Robert's Arundel, which introduces several of the major characters of Rabble in Arms, and details Arnold's march to Quebec through the wilds of Maine and his assualt on the walled city.