Military Intelligence Blunders and Coverups

Apparently Colonel John Hughes-Wilson was in British Military Intelligence for a decade, and made a study of the profession and practice while he was there. When he left, he set out to write a book on the history of the art, using various historical examples to show why things work out the way they do, and why certain practices should be followed or avoided. The book follows a simple format. The first chapter is an introduction to the subject, explaining the objective of Military Intelligence and the means of obtaining, evaluating, and disseminating the information involved. The rest of the chapters (save a short conclusion) discuss individual events from the past sixty years where an army or nation was surprised or somehow failed by intelligence. There's a brief discussion of the overall course of the battle and the parameters of what the author wishes to discuss, and then a critical analysis of the intelligence that was available, how it was handled, and what was made of it by the end-users. Usually, of course, the end-user ignored or misused the intelligence, and the result was a disaster. The one minor quibble I had with the book was the selection of the various anecdotes involved. I felt that a couple were badly selected (notably the one on Malaya in 1942) mostly because the battles involved were British, and of course the author is a Brit. That having been noted, it doesn't detract much from the overall impact of the book, and there actually is some worthwhile information even in that chapter. I would have preferred, however, if he'd used something like the Japanese failure at the Battle of Midway, where their signal intelligence basically lost them the battle. That all being said, this is a very worthwhile and intelligent book, and I would recommend it to anyone interested in the subject.

This is one the best books about military intelligence that I have read. Having spent many years working in the area, I find that most other books on the subject are written by outsiders who never quite fully understand what they are writing about, no matter how bright or well intentioned they may be. Few outsiders appreciate, for example, the details of the intelligence cycle, the multiple layers of intelligence collectors, the rivalries among collection agencies, the correct technical jargon, the practical effects on intelligence analysis of inter-agency battles for bigger budgets, etc. Hughes-Wilson utilizes a case study approach. He analyzes nine different events or conflicts from World War II to the present. Having read about many of the conflicts before, I did not expect to learn much that was new. However, the author presented many new factual details about the events involving the Brits, in particular, that were fascinating. He was clearly a very informed observer and/or possible participant in many of the conflicts. His analysis of the American failure in Tet 1968 is one of the most incisive and dispassionate that I have read. He is no fan of official histories. He is blunt in his criticisms. His comments (actually a very minor part of his Pearl Harbor story)about the FBI's handling of Japanese and German espionage in WW II makes one seriously question the FBI's competence to work effectively as an intelligence organization at that time. But, then has anything really gotten better at the FBI? Bottom line: As one other reviewer has commented, Hughes-Wilson's real message is that political considerations - whether those of a totalitarian regime or a democracy - often lead to what are called "intelligence blunders." His call for truly objective and independent intelligence collection, analysis and dissemination should be heeded, but it will probably be ignored. We will see more such blunders again.

This is a book about modern military campaigns and the military intelligence or lack there of involved. I enjoyed this book, it gives a often overlooked perspective on military battles and campaigns. It also tells some of the pitfalls of modern military intelligence and where they have triumphed and failed. There are examples from WWII, the Falkland Wars and the Gulf War plus a few more. Not all of the results can lay at the feet of military intelligence but it does give a good perspective of what didn't happen as far as intelligence was concerned and what happened because of that lack. For a different perspective and insight into well known modern wars and the often overlooked and not talked about intelligence and the mistakes they make. I give it an A.

I'm not sure the title of this book is a very good description of what it addresses, though military intelligence activities (both in true intelligence work, but also quite a bit of counter-intelligence stuff) are discussed quite a bit. Whatever the title, it is a very interesting and worthwhile book. Even if you've read dozens of books discussing the conflicts covered here (five chapters of various aspects of World War II and then one each on Vietnam, '73 Arab-Israeli War, Falklands War, Gulf War) you'll see quite a bit of new material and insight here. The author's got a good narrative style, though he does jump around a bit. In addition to intelligence work, he covers political, military, and diplomatic activities that have substantial impacts on the campaigns discussed. He also discusses the campaigns themselves. This book fills a real gap, in my estimation, in understanding much that is never reported and seldom discussed about why wars and battles go the way they do. Overall a very good assessment of intel activities and the pol-mil considerations that go into why a particular campaign was successful or not (at least at the outset).

I am a history buff and this book is excellent at giving you an understanding of what happened at some of the most important wars in our recent history. Hughes-Wilson does not pull punches. There are many analogies between militay/political and business decisions. In places the author is redundant, but so what? The information and analysis is in depth and opened my eyes to many things I did not know. Hughes-Wilson's explanation of of the evolution of human and electronic and how they relate is facinating.