Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment

An at times frustratingly complex work of philosophy, which is well worth the effort. Brandom successfully tranposes ideas and concepts from transcendental philosophy (Heiddeggger, Kant, Hegel) into an analytic idiom. As others have sited Brandom is not an easy philosopher to understand, it takes time and effort to get through this text, but the reward is certainly worth the effort, in that Brandom is one of the very few (constructive) philosophers to defend the concept of rationality (Habermas being the other) using a convincing and novel approach which actually succeeds in answering the postmodern challenge to reason (by addressing their arguments directly). Oh, would urge anyone having difficulty understanding some of Brandom's arguments to check out Jeremy Wanderer's book on Brandom.

Brandom deals with a number of outstanding problems in philosphy of language, epistemology, and philosophy of mind as these came to be construed by several generations of analytic philosophy beginning with Frege and continuing through Quine, Davidson, and Dummett. His solutions fall out of a Sellarsian theory grounded in the idea that meaning, inference, and epistemic justification are grounded in norms governing social interactions and practices. Brandom's treatment of standard questions of reference which have plagued us since Russell are particularly original and ingenious. Like the rest of his themes, this account is developed in detail with admirable rigor and honesty. Difficult but indespensible reading.

Finally, a book has come along which discusses Wilfrid Sellars philosophy which is even more difficult to read than Sellars himself. Brandom writes like a medieval scholastic footnoting and expanding the ideas envisioned by Wilfrid Sellars and conflated by Richard Rorty. Still, if one has the patience to make through this sometimes tedious 750 page book, one will be greatly rewarded.