Love All/Busman's Honeymoon

I first read the novel of "Busman's Honeymoon." Then I purchased a copy of the movie. Finally I learned that this was a play first. I enjoyed the different version and think it is worth the purchase. However I think the novel tells more of what the characters are thinking. The play written by Dorothy L. Sayers and Muriel Byane is the last chapter on the relationship between Lord Peter Wimsey and Herriot Vane. They are finally married. There is a well written introduction that gives insight as to what was to be accomplished in the play. It is the equipollent of the voice over commentaries present on today's DVDs.

I have just returned(well a few hours ago) from a staged reading of Love All. This is a beautiful play, and it is a great tragedy it was never filmed. Thsi would have made a wonderful movie with say Cary Grant as Godfrey and Katherine Hepburn as Janet. The play is in some ways similar to the works of Ayn Rand. Unlike Ms. Rand's work the play is extremely funny, but the overall theme that one's work is all that matters. That it comes first, and that it is impossible to be a fulfilled, happy human being without it is paramount. If you ever get a chance to read or see this play, do so at all costs.

Feminist fans of Dorothy L. Sayers's Vane-Wimsey novels will find LOVE ALL a delightful change of pace. The companion play to the dramatic version of the novel BUSMAN'S HONEYMOON in this edition, LOVE ALL takes a very different approach to male-female relations. While she creates for Harriet Vane and Lord Peter Wimsey a fulfilling personal and professional relationship in BUSMAN'S HONEYMOON, Sayers suggests in LOVE ALL that women can find emotional fulfillment, financial security, and artistic challenges on their own. Written in 1937-38 and staged in 1940 and 1941, LOVE ALL focuses on a love triangle that almost becomes a love "square," composed of the narcissistic romance novelist Godfrey Daybrook; his wife Edith, who writes hit plays under the pseudonym Janet Reed; his mistress, the temperamental actress Lydia Hillington; and his secretary Mary Birch. Unlike Lord Peter Wimsey, Godfrey Daybrook is incapable of respecting women or their work, nor does he have a sense of humor. And while he is, of course, only one character in the play, Sayers suggests that he is a typical male. Alzina Stone Dale points out in her introduction to the play that "with the exception of the worldly and wily theatrical producer, all the male characters are patronizing, homosexual, or childish. Sayers's women, on the other hand, quickly establish a mutual aid society and adamantly refuse to pander any longer to the demands of the moderately charming novelist, Godfrey Daybrook" (xxix). While Godfrey has set up housekeeping in Venice with his mistress Lydia and his secretary, Edith has temporarily entrusted their son to his grandmother, taken a flat in London, and launched a play-writing career as "Janet Reed." Godfrey may have described Edith to Lydia as "a good wife, a good mother, a painfully good woman, sensible, cultivated. . . . with a college education--only not the smallest, faintest touch of charm or glamour," but he returns to London to find his cast-off wife dashing to opening night parties, flirting with actors, and wearing the latest fashions (136-7). Instantly aware of his wife's new desirability, Godfrey becomes jealous and suspects her of having taken a lover. He concludes that Edith's failure to divorce him as she promised must result from her preoccupation with a new male love-interest.Much to his surprise, Godfrey learns that Edith's delay in divorcing him results not from her having been caught up in a whirlwind romance but from having launched a whirlwind career. "Three days after you went off," she tells him, "I got a wire from the management saying they'd take the play. . . . and rushed up to Town and put in a strenuous month getting the contract signed, and then there was casting--you've seen what's that like--and rehearsals--" (168, 170). When he rages, "Great heavens, Edith, have you no sense of proportion? Surely our married life is of more importance than a few rehearsals!", she replies, "But it wasn't our married life. It was y