Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew

parallels, confirmation, insights.

Ehrman takes a messy and divisive topic and brings a tempered clarity to the discussion. Highly recommend for anyone interested in the history of Christianity or comparative religious studies.

This book belongs in every persons home library that is on a quest for religious truth. Professor Ehrman takes us to the starting point of Christianity and shows the splintering of the church into the Pauline Christians, the Jersulem churches (followers of Jesus's brother), the Petrine Christians (Catholics),and the Gnostics later on. It is fascinating to read the history of how the proto-orthodox fought so hard about the theology of whether Jesus was man or God or both before the orthodox Christians came to dominate. It will take you from Jesus up to Constatine's Roman Catholic Church. Of the forty books I have read on Christian origins this is the best by far, due to it being written historically with out all the irrational emotion that accompanies the Atheist fundamentalists or the Christian fundamentalists.This is educational and fact based, by a teacher.I highly recommend.

Incredible. Superlatives pile up when I think of this book. Lost Christianities should be read by every Christian. Far too many people believe that the New Testament and every Christian belief and doctrine sprang up full grown from the death of Jesus. Bart D. Ehrman demonstrates that this is not so with great precision and style. And it is an eminently readable work. It is not a long book, and by no means exhaustive, but in 12 chapters and just under 300 information packed pages, Professor Ehrman manages to draw a coherent outline of Christianty's development out of a myriad of conflicting and opposing beliefs, and shows how, in the end, the victors wrote the history books. This book's companion volume, Lost Scriptures, is not essential but is very helpful. I did not have a copy of this myself until I was halfway through Lost Christianities and my experience was greatly enhanced by its addition, giving me recourse to the texts described but necessarily truncated in the main volume. If you are interested in the early history of Christianity, Lost Christianities is a must have. It belongs on every shelf.

If you like mysteries, true detective stories, and historical controversies, Professor Ehrman's newest book is just right for you. It is about early Christianity, or more accurately, early "Christianities." Why the plural? Simply because in the first centuries after Christ, there was no one single group which could be called the authentic "Christian" religion. There was, instead, a diversity of Christian groups, each with its own beliefs, practices, and sacred texts. There was no New Testament. There were many other books, gospels, epistles, and so forth, other than those that would eventually become the New Testament as we know it today. These other books were widely read and fervently followed by various groups of early Christians. Some of these early Christian groups held beliefs that today would be considered bizarre. Some of them believed there were two Gods, not one, and some believed there might be twelve, or as many as thirty gods. Some believed that a malicious deity, rather than one true God, created the world. Some taught that Jesus' death and resurrection had nothing to do with salvation. Still others insisted that Jesus never really died at all. If such beliefs were once common, why do they no longer exist? What were these other books which were considered as Christian "Scriptures"? What did these other Scriptures say? Do they still exist? Ehrman's book is about the struggle for orthodoxy, or "right belief," in early Christianity. You will see the process by which certain Christian beliefs gained legitimacy, while others were relegated to be mere footnotes to history. You will see how Christianity developed in those early years, hear about the early Christian writings, many lost to history but some newly discovered, and you will witness the development of the New Testament into an approved canon of Scripture. But how did this take place? Who decided which books should be included in the today's Canon? Since there were so many books available at the time, who decided, and on what grounds, which should be included? How do we know they got it right? Many of the early writings were known to be forgeries. How can we sure that forgeries weren't included in the New Testament? Along the way in this adventure story you'll meet the Ebionites who kept Jewish customs and strictly followed the Jewish laws. They thought that Jesus was the most righteous man on earth and because of this was "adopted" by God to be his son when he was baptized by John the Baptist. They denied that Jesus was himself divine, but insisted that he was fully human and the result of a sexual union between Joseph and Mary. They did not hold to the doctrine of the virgin birth. You'll meet the Marcionites, whose founder, Marcion, argued that the Christian God of love could not have also been the Creator God of the Old Testament. He believed that the gospel of Jesus Christ is entirely a gospel of love to the exclusion of the Mosaic Law. He believed that the original gospel of