In Lieu of Heaven

In Lieu of Heaven is a metaphorical, deeply provocative novel that I cannot help but address on two different levels, one literary and the other religious. The whole novel is framed in the mists of spirituality, as we meet one character traveling through lonesome woods in a quest for some kind of truth - ostensibly, his is a quest to find God. Out in the middle of nowhere, he comes across a beautiful garden and meets another man, one who will take his ambiguous quest in a completely new direction. It is difficult to review this book because the identity of the man in the Garden is essential to the story, yet I cannot reveal his identity without giving too much of the story away. The man in the garden tells the traveler a tale that is impossible yet, somehow, strangely feasible, and the "truths" unleashed from the man's lips send the traveler into a spiritual whirlwind. He is forced to question the very tenets of his beliefs, and it makes for a soul-jarring experience. The old man's message is that God is the penultimate Bad Guy, a jealous, neglectful Father responsible for all the woes of mankind. This revelation is couched in the sacred writings of the Bible itself, which makes it all the more telling on the traveler's heart and soul. In terms of the book as literature, it is a great success; it turns the kind of moralistic writing Nathaniel Hawthorne (as one example) excelled at completely on its head, proving very effective indeed. Emotions run high throughout the two men's extended conversation, and we see into their hearts and minds in really quite provocative ways. What makes In Lieu of Heaven such an extraordinary novel to me, though, is the fact that Kevin Archer is actually a former Christian missionary. As such, his knowledge of the Bible is impressive and lends extra strength to his arguments. From my perspective as a conservative Southern Baptist, there is a definite shock value associated with reading this novel. I think this is just what the author intended, however, and that in itself is a further sign of the impressive literary character of the story. Obviously, I do not agree with Archer's condemnation of God as the ultimate bad guy in human history, but my disagreement on this point should not (and hopefully does not) color my review of the novel. If everyone already agreed with the author's own conclusions, he would never have written such a provocative novel in the first place. My own familiarity with the Bible actually makes Archer's argument all the more impressive; I can see just how knowledgeable he is and can pick up on the almost relentless references he makes to Biblical passages. Each such reference is actually footnoted as well, so interested readers can go to the Bible passages themselves, if so inclined, while reading the novel. One can read almost anything into the Bible, as human history has shown. I admire the fact that Archer has documented all of his references; this tells me he is not fo

Author Kevin Archer does not identify with any specific religious group, preferring to practice Zen and meditation, and the power of the profound world view that "It takes much more will to be a man than to be a god" is unforgettably expressed within In Lieu Of Heaven, a philosophical and deftly probing novel about two men who meet in the wilderness - one of whom is on a tireless quest to meet God, while the other claims to have already done so. The crossing of their paths brings about difficult examination of each other's beliefs, and will lead the reader down a personal path of self-examination concerning the concepts of God and individual faith. An exploratory and unapologetically deconstructive narrative ponderance, In Lieu Of Heaven is an enthusiastically recommended novel -- especially for those who prefer their literary entertainment to be thoughtful and thought-provoking.

The wanderer is on a journey and manages to stumble across the greatest conspiracy in the entire history of human culture.Where do you go when everything you know is wrong?Well...there seems to be a reasonable answer.Great read, stimulating, provocative!

This is a delightful work of metaphorical escape that should be a wonderful read for anyone with an unhappily repressive or narrow religious upbringing. The author does not fail to discuss tough issues, nor does he shy away from controversy. It is serious and witty both in a way that grows on you. Somehow it reminded me of Mount Analogue or of (Boyd's) Last Starship from Earth. A very Good Read!