Flawed Advice and the Management Trap: How Managers Can Know When They're Getting Good Advice and When They're Not

This is another fine book by Argyris. I think this, in addition to "Strategic Organizational Change" by Beitler, is very helpful. (Beitler has an outstanding chapter on how to evaluate consultants.)

I recommend everything that Chris Argyris writes. This is no exception. This book has insight about management advice that reminds me of the work of Alfred Kieser at the University of Mannheim (Germany). I highly recommend the work of both Argyris and Kieser.Dr. Michael BeitlerAuthor of "Strategic Organizational Change"

Argyris tackles the question of why managers continue to be drawn to the latest management advice offered in books and articles in spite of the fact that a great deal of it is flawed. He attempts here to clue readers in on how to tell the difference between good and bad advice. He warns against embracing any "Wow!" type advice from top-selling gurus. Too often with this type of stuff, Argyris argues, managers use external advice rather than base their management on getting a read of the internal commitment of employees. As a result, managers lose credibility. Argyris takes on big-name gurus like Stephen Covey and calls into question the true validity of his work by showing the flaws in Covey's thinking. He uses the example that Covey uses of not telling his son how he truly feels when he wants to get him to do something because he knows his sons knows. Argyris looks at this theory of Covey that trust brings out the best in people and points that that while it may be "morally attractive," t's just not clear how "a combination of trust and mistrust, accompanied by cover-ups, will bring out the best in people." One of the take-aways from this book is the need to continually test and challenge management approaches and not to rest of what's successful, since success, Argyris writes "can breed conservatism which in a fast-changing, competitive environment can cause failure."

This is one of the most interesting and useful management books I have read in many years. I would give it 10 Stars if that were possible!As a management consultant, I always begin assignments by asking our clients what has worked well and what has not worked well with past assignments that consultants have done for them. Almost all of the problems are associated with so-called experts who espoused a theory, had a few examples of where the theory seemed to fit, and left the client with no idea of how to use the advice. Recently, I had a chance to read Simplicity, which points out that most employees would love to implement new directions, but they almost never receive the information, learning opportunities, or tools to make it possible. As you can imagine, this can lead to a lot of frustration. One of my hypotheses about why this occurs is because the executives espousing the change don't know how to provide the information, learning opportunities, or tools needed.As someone who reads and reviews a lot of business books, I am constantly struck by the flaws in the arguments that the authors propose. You can imagine how pleased I was to see that Chris Argyris (one of the best management thinkers around) was bothered by many of the same flaws. You will get a chance to see obvious errors in The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People by Stephen Covey and Managing Change by John Kotter, just to mention two examples from the book.Argyris argues that the authors of these flawed theories are themselves unaware of the flaws. Essentially, all useless management theories have problems in one or more of these areas: the executive is in unilateral control of whatever is going to happen next (rather than letting everyone participate in a meaningful way), the executive focuses on winning instead of losing, the executive suppresses her/his negative feelings as well as those of others, and action is based on rational principles. The result of this approach is to discourage communication, and to make everyone feel defensive. This habit reinforces two of the most common sources of stalled progress in organizations. Argyris proposes an alternate approach which feature relying on valid information that can be independently verified (99 out of 100 business books have no such grounding); detailed information about what needs to be done; and free and open discussion of the subject and process. Books like Harnessing Complexity and The Soul at Work would applaud these points as well. Essentially, Argyris says that consultants and authors are proposing command-and-control solutions based on rhetoric that the proposers do not really believe in and apply themselves. That's a pretty big indictment. If you go back and read the early books on subjects like reengineering, TQM, and Economic Value Added, look for the independently verifiable data, encouragement for all to discuss, and directions for how each person in the organ

Chris Argyris once again illuminates the never ending task of closing the gap between Espoused- Theory and Theory-in-Use plagueing so many organizations today. The cover-ups, the politicing, the back-stabbing, and useless meetings that go on are largely a result of the inability of individuals to surface assumptions and question the mental models that shape behavior. Argyris provides a usefull set of tools for surfacing mental models to ensure that theories are actionable and not perpetuating the counterproductive behaviors mentioned above. I found the example of a consulting project gone sour quite amusing, having recently left a firm with quite similar dysfunctional behavior. I recommend this book to those unfamiliar with Agryris and his work as a great introduction to some of his thinking on learning organizations (Agryris' work provides some of the foundation for Senge's "The Fifth Discipline") and a humorous roast of some popular advice from authors like Stephen Covey, Doyle & Strauss, John Katzenbach, notable CEOs, and other "successful leader's".