What distinguishes good explanations in neuroscience from bad? Carl F. Craver constructs and defends standards for evaluating neuroscientific explanations that are grounded in a systematic view of what neuroscientific explanations are: descriptions of multilevel mechanisms. In developing this approach, he draws on a wide range of examples in the history of neuroscience (e.g. Hodgkin and Huxleys model of the action potential and LTP as a putative explanation...
Related Subjects
Basic Sciences Behavioral Sciences Clinical Cognitive Cognitive Psychology Consciousness & Thought Education & Reference Health, Fitness & Dieting Health, Fitness & Dieting History & Philosophy Humanities Medical Medical Books Neurology Neuropsychology Neuroscience Philosophy Psychology Psychology & Counseling Reference Science Science & Math Science & Scientists Science & Technology Textbooks