Evolution from Creation to New Creation

This book may not be exceptionally detailed on everything it addresses, but it is by far the best survey of the issues pertaining to theistic evolution that I have yet encountered. Ted Peters and Martinez (a theologian and a scientist) work together in an attempt to bring together Christian theology and Darwinian evolution. They are excellent at critiquing young earth creationists, intelligent design advocates, and especially theistic evolutionists. Perhaps the most encouraging part of all is that they do all of this from an orthodox Christian perspective. It seems to be very hard to find books supporting theistic evolution which do not rely on open theism, process theism, or something resembling deism. Peters and Hewlett avoid all of these, and effectively critique other theistic evolutionists for straying from orthodox belief about God's nature (which is not to say that evolution has no impact on our understanding of God, but instead that it does not necessitate a departure from traditional Christianity). Let me briefly summarize the four main sections of the book: First, they examine the "war" between Christianity and science. What they conclude (I think correctly) is that the war is not over whether Christianity or science is true. The war is over what constitutes science. Young earth creationists are not denying the validity of the scientific enterprise, or rejecting that we should attempt to determine the laws of the universe. What they are denying is that evolution is valid science. They proceed to examine what exactly Darwinian evolution means, and the negative results some have taken from it (e.g. social Darwinism, evolutionary psychology, etc.). This helps us to understand why it is that many Christians are wary of evolution: just look at the bad things people like eugenics programs that have resulted from what people understood to be the practical application of Darwin's theory. The authors explain why these things do not follow from Darwinian theory, removing some major obstacles many Christians have preventing them from even considering evolution. Second, the authors examine alternate positions on creationism. They deal very fairly with young earth creationism, avoiding the unnecessary condescension many theistic evolutionists unfortunately use. They take seriously the concerns of young earth creationists, but ultimately conclude that they are misguided in their insistence that Genesis 1-2 be taken literally. They seem to skip over old earth creationism, which is somewhat odd, though some of their criticisms of young earth creationism and intelligent design would also apply to the old earth position. As for intelligent design, Hewlett and Peters examine the history of the position (back to Paley's watchmaker argument), and specifically address the arguments of Phillip Johnson, Michael Behe, and William Dembski. Of the three, they find Dembski's the most convincing (they conclude that Johnson does not really under

Ted Peters and Martinez Hewlett have written an absolutely remarkable book. I was recommended this book by a friend who's working on his PhD at Princeton in Theology and Science and he was right - this was an excellent read. I spent most of my life as a staunch (and horribly uninformed) critic of any sort of acceptance of evolution: I really did see it as an enemy to the church, and went to great lengths to make this clear. I remember in third grade we'd watch videos in class that would talk about evolution, and I'd write papers that I'd always entitle "Truth" about how actually, God created everything and that evolution was just plain wrong. Fortunately my third grade teacher didn't see this as a reason to fail me. Peters' and Hewlett's book starts out by talking about the very conflict that I was having in the classroom setting, and how this has really become a delicate all-out war (see chapter one). Towards the latter part of my seminary education I started to realize that my brick-like thoughts (as in unmovable) might not be the most helpful thing: but didn't seriously look at the issues until just a couple months ago when I started communicating with some of my seminary friends who I knew held evolutionary beliefs. This book is ideal for someone like myself who's never really read a survey of a large variety of view on the issue. Peters and Hewlett discuss and survey topics including Darwin, Darwinism, Neo-Darwinism Synthesis, Social Darwinism, Sociobiology, Evolutionary Psychology, Scientific Creationism, Intelligent Design, and finally Theistic Evolution. Within all this they discuss the many positives and negatives that have been birthed out of the different Darwinist traditions and interpretations, from the horrors of Frances Galton's Eugenics to the beauty of theologically interpreted creative evolution (you can see my clear bent away from atheistic evolution and towards theistic evolution). It's important to note, however, that the "nice/not nice" line is in no way defined by theists/a-theists. That is to say, the book gives clear support that there have been many naturalistic thinkers (i.e., a-theistic) who have argued for high moral standards, and there have been theists who have perhaps argued for not so high of standards. People discussed in the book include Herbert Spencer, E.O. Wilson, Thomas Aquinas, William Paley, Michael Behe, William Dembski, Phillip Johnson, Teilhard de Chardin, Philip Hefner, John Haught, Arthur Peacocke, and others. The book closes with Peters and Hewlett describing their own system of theistic evolution, which I find to be quite convincing. I learned a lot from this book, and would definitely recommend it to anyone seeking an understanding of these issues. The book ends by saying, "In earlier editions of Origin of Speicies, Darwin opened with a quotation from Francis Bacon admonishing us to read `the book of God's word' and also `the book of God's works.' This is sound advice" (

This book gives a great walk through the issues surrounding creationism, intelligent design and theistic evolution. The authors also publish a shorter version called, "Can You Believe In God And Evolution: A Guide For The Perplexed." I read the shorter version and then decided to buy and read the longer one. The shorter book is just half as long.

This is a good overview of the spectrum of debate between science and the Bible. It covers the various flavors of Darwinism, social Darwinism, scientific creationism, intelligent design and theistic evolution by two theistic evolutionists, one (Peters) a professor of systematic theology and the other (Hewlett) an emeritis professor of biology and medicine. The authors present each view positively, then offer their critiques, clearly labeling their opinions as opinions. Their treatment of theistic evolution is particularly good, in that it clearly labels and systematically discusses the spectrum of flavors of theistic evolution, from reluctant acceptor (B. B. Warfield) to enthusiastic supporter (Theilhard de Chardin), along with the views of six others (Kenneth Miller, Arthur Peacock, Denis Edwards, John Haught, Robert John Russell and Philip Hefner) in between. The authors conclude the book with their own "Constructive Proposal." The book includes extensive notes, a glossary, an index and a scripture index. I highly recommend it to Christians seeking to better understand the pros and cons of each viewpoint, particularly theistic evolution. Unfortunately, there is virtually no discussion of Old Earth Creationism and Progressive Creationism, which is why I gave it only four stars.

This book is one of those extraordinary reads. I bought it simply because i had Martinez Hewlett along with Thomas Lindell and William Stoeger as team teachers for an unusual and very interesting seminar class at the U of Arizona, theology and biology. It was a continuation of Dr. Lindell's interests in bioethics and exactly how to relate science to theology in a constructive and useful, to both parties, manner. A truely unique experience for which i am again thankful. But if buying this book because of the author was the reason for opening it and reading the first few chapters, i would have stopped there, for the book itself must carry my interest from that point. This one did. Very much so, engaging, informative, interesting, clever, structured wisely- just a few of my comments. I seldom thoroughly enjoy a book as much as i did this one, i even wrote WOW on the last page in my yellow highlighter, it is good. Why? First, it represents the culmination of two really interesting people's work. Dr. Hewlett is a clever, talented, thoughtful and spiritually aware man. He is a poet, a novelist, a viral researcher, but most appropriately to this book- a good teacher. There is something special about a talented teacher who can unfold a topic IN ORDER, with a structure that shows the neophyte how the pieces fit together. And gives us the pieces in an order that helps us see the big picture that the author's themselves grasp. Hey readers, this is RARE. More often you hit things in a logical or chronological order, pieces are thrown at you without reference to the big picture. So you often are lost as a student in a new field in the forest, concentrating on the trees and never ever able to understand why anyone would actually come to this forest. A good teacher, or a good writer, never lets the structure interfere with your reason for being there, for your motivation to read the next page. But they have you anticipate and salivate for the next chapter or the next idea. Second, it represents distilled knowledge, carefully written to teach the essentials of the debate so that you can be lead to understand their big point. There is lots of background information here, people, spectrums, differentiations between close ideas, that are the meat and potatoes of this feast. Yet the point they want you to understand is available in just a few pages- chapter 7 Theistic Evolution: A Constructive Proposal, but you must read the book pretty much in straight order to get there. This is because of the culmulativeness of the material, the distinctions that they make, and the specialized vocabulary you need to understand. So pick it up and read front to back, with a pen in hand to markup and take notes, this is not a walk in the park book, but a serious analysis, worthy of your best efforts. Third, i am impressed at the carefulness of the structure. Intro, Darwin, Social Darwinism, Creationism, ID, TE then their proposal. It is certainly the result of Dr. Hewlett's teach