East Lynne

This book will be enjoyed both by readers who appreciate Ellen Wood's ghost stories and those who devour Sensation fiction. It conveys some of the uncanny atmosphere of the former while remaining as compulsively readable as Lady Audley's Secret. While it is not a Great Work of Literature, let me assure those who genuinely understand and appreciate popular fiction, and are therefore capable of distinguishing between worthwhile examples and trash, that this falls into the former category. I felt that this needed particular emphasis, in order to counteract the hideous possibility that condescending recommendations meted out by self-aggrandizing, obtuse snobs might actually succeed in influencing the perspectives of the impressionable. As for those who have already discovered for themselves that Popular Fiction and Trash are not synonymous; that, furthermore, there is no such thing as Good Trash (after all, if one likes a novel one views as trash, isn't that person bound to renounce either the enjoyment or the disapproval?); and that, most importantly, our Lasting Works of Literature have sprung from a diverse variety of arenas that span the entire range of the culture spectrum; well, maybe they understand why I was peeved enough to pen this little piece.

I loved the novel "East Lynne" and am now reading it for the 2nd time. I could not put the book down and kept reading and reading. I recommended it to my mother and she also read it and loved it. It is Mrs. Henry Wood's greatest triumph. The reader feels so greatly for Lady Isabel, one wishes the ending were happier for her. The deaths of little William and finally Lady Isabel bring many tears. No wonder it was such a success in the Victorian era and it should be printed again in this time, to counter so much trash and vulgarity that is written.I certainly can believe how successful it must have been when it was first printed in 1861. I also believe anyone who reads it wishes Lady Isabel back in her ex-husband's life and Barbara Hare out! Wonderful!!

Mrs Henry Wood's novel itself doesn't need any recommandation: generations of readers have literally devoured it. My rating however is valid only for the novel in itself.What I should like to comment upon is the edition -- and here my rating is just 2 -- published as a volume of "Everyman's Library"...The text is disfigured by dozens...of misprints -- from a philological point of view, this edition is just useless.The volume is out of print at the moment. This should be welcomed by the editors as an occasion to correct those numberless misprints. If they don't do so, there is only one comment possible on their edition: forget it.