Douglas McGregor, Revisited

i want to write Report on ` Enterprise - The Human Aspects `

McGregor's work is classic. This is required reading for executives.Dr. Michael BeitlerAuthor of "Strategic Organizational Change"

This book is a real gem. The 140 pages or so of outline on McGregor's ideas is invaluable. I've read Human Side Of Enterprise, but the way the authors explain theory Y brought a lot of light to my understanding of McGregor's ideas. McGregor's ideas reach much farther than I realized, and the authors are virtuosos at explaining the real profundity in the Human Side of Enterprise. I recommend this book highly, even to those well versed in this stuff. I also learned a lot by the modern examples (like Lincoln Electric and Herman Miller) of companies which follow theory Y. Douglas McGregor does not have all the answers. But even if McGregor is not the last word on management, all future thinkers will have to grapple with the ideas and the questions (so many!) that he put forth.

When I was in business school (back in the Dark Ages), McGregor was considered the finest thinker about organizational behavior. He grasped that behavioral science offered great promise for making organizations more effective and more desirable places to be. Everyone was excited about the potential of his assumptions about people in the workplace: Employees want to do a good job; they will make extra effort to learn and accomplish more; they have the potential to much more; and it makes great sense to get everyone involved as much as possible. At the time, it seemed like the first breath of fresh air in the stale world of corporate bureaucracies. Although I haven't thought much about McGregor in over 20 years, I realize that I was profoundly influenced by his thinking.Reading this fine book gave me a valuable new perspective on McGregor -- that a central weakness of many companies and managers is that the comapny's leadership is not consciously aware of what it assumes about its employees. While almost every company espouses humanistic and empowerment ideas and ideals, many continue to operate in the same old command and control way. Most of the focus is on creating carrots and sticks to manipulate behavior. Why don't people get it? McGregor had figured out that managers don't think much about their assumptions about employees. McGregor made the important point that everyone needs to determine what those assumptions are (Can people be trusted? If yes, use Theory Y. If no, use Theory X). What happens now is that many people hold Theory X beliefs that employees cannot be trusted and but try to use Theory Y methods (that they can), and the mixed messages keep everyone confused. 'I want you to take full charge of this project, but check with me before doing anything.' Sound familiar?In particular, managers don't really understand Maslow's hierarchy of needs. As simple needs are fulfilled, psychic needs become more important such as working on something that will make a difference. Chapters 6 and 7 are especially good on how intrinsic personal motivation is created. This book is excellent in that it contains a retrospective perspective on McGregor as well as some of McGregor's own key essays. I especially enjoyed Warren Bennis's essay on the weaknesses in McGregor's argument: How do managers get their needs served if they are always servant leaders (see Joe Jaworski's excellent book, Synchronicity to get an answer to that) and what is the role of the environment on the needs of the worker in the workplace? Clearly, the Internet is one example of a new force that irresitibly is creating Theory Y contexts for accomplishment, independent of what managers do. The main weakness of this book is that it does not point out that the limit to Theory Y was that McGregory did not give enough detail to make it possible to know exactly what to do. See Bill Jenson's book, Simplicity, for the significance o

If a list were compiled of the most influential business thinkers, McGregor's name would be near the top of that list. This brilliant book explains why. The authors enable us to "revisit" the unique achievements of someone who is too often under-appreciated or, worse yet, ignored. According to Peter Drucker, "With every passing year, McGregor's message becomes ever more relevant, more timely, and more important." The material is organized as follows:Part 1 Why McGregor MattersPart 2 Selected Essays of Douglas McGregorIn the first part, the authors provide a brilliant introduction to the essays which then follow. They quote liberally from McGregor's classic work, The Human Side of Enterprise. Perhaps you are already familiar with Robert Owen (1771-1858) whom James O'Toole characterizes as "the Thomas Edison of social invention. He was the first to devise or advocate numerous practices in industrial relations, education, and social policy that are still considered progressive today, more than 130 years after his death." More than a century later, McGregor addresses many of the same issues which Owen did. For example:1. Creating a workplace in which people are treated as human beings2. Offering incentives and rewards which enable people to motivate themselves to produce work of consistently high quality3. Viewing the work force as an investment, not as a cost4. Supporting and nourishing the personal as well as professional development of that work force5. Formulating means by which to measure worker performance accurately...and fairlyHere is a brief excerpt from The Human Side of Enterprise:"The outstanding fact about relationships in the modern industrial organization is that they involve a high degree of interdependence. Not only are subordinates dependent upon those above them in the organization for satisfying their needs and achieving their goals, but managers at every level are dependent upon all those below them for achieving their own and organizational goals."These observations by McGregor explain why it is no coincidence that, year after year, the companies rated "the best to work for" are the same companies which dominate their respective industries, the same companies which have the greatest market value. In his various works, McGregor devotes substantial attention to two different theories which "are not managerial strategies. They are underlying beliefs about the nature of man that influence managers to adopt one strategy rather than another." The core assumptions of Theory X are that (1) managers alone must organize and control the work to be done, (2) workers must totally subordinate their needs to those of the organization, (3) without strict supervision, workers would be indifferent (perhaps resistant) to the organization's needs because (4) the average worker is indolent, lacks ambition, prefers to be supervised, is self-centered, and dislikes change.The core assumptions of Theor