Deadly Innocence

While this book is one of the most important books in terms of understanding the dissident viewpoint regarding HIV and AIDS,I do wish it had been written better. The narrative point of view is annoying, distracting and unnecessary. Horowitz also appears to get distracted by the discovery of Hillary Rodham Clinton and Janet Reno's effort to revamp the entire human services industry in Florida (prior to the Clinton presidency) without really pulling it all together in terms of how this affects the corruption of the AIDS industry. I'm sure there is an overlap, but I wish he had spelled it out more effectively. At the end, he gets into this annoying political diatribe about Clintonian politics and liberal values and a "back to basics" family values solution that made me wonder if he was born before Clinton was president. Or is he simply too privileged to realize that human services was just as horrendous to parents prior to Clinton? Or perhaps that was before it was fathers that were targeted, when it was okay to target single mothers? All these things are beside the point, and totally get away from the most important things that are said mostly in the first third of the book. For that alone, this book is a crucial aspect of dissident reading. It is just unfortunate that his obvious conservative bias takes away from the truth that all Americans, conservative and liberal, need to know if we are going to survive this outrageous holocaust.