Constitutional Diplomacy

Glennon worked on the War Powers Resolution and knows a thing or two about the Constitutional limits in foreign affairs. The best reason to read this book is the Framework Glennon provides for Constitutional analysis. Have you ever tired of the debates between the various schools of constitutional interpretation? I have because all of the schools - well, most of them - have their uses depending on the circumstances. Glennon does not argue for one school or the other, but provides a hierarchy to order three levels of analysis. He then uses these levels (Textual, Case law/Custom, Original Intent/Functionalism) to analyze several areas of foreign affairs and the Constitution. I have found that his framework works just as well when grappling with constitutional problems outside the foreign affairs arena. Glennon's framework can be improved by adding a level that looks at the structure of the Constitution. This is sort of like using text in the sense that, like text, the structure is there for all to see and argue over. It is different from the textual level in that it is much less explicit. I use it at level 2 ½, but I' listen to an argument for other placement.