Botanica's Roses: The Encyclopedia of Roses

... buy this book. It was extremely helpful to us as we planned and planted a large rose garden from scratch this spring. The pictures are superior to those you will find in most catalogs. The descriptions, while maddeningly inconsistent in the information they provide, give an independent check to the glowing descriptions that catalogs use to promote rose purchases. Some roses are less desirable -- less robust, less fragrant, less orderly in their growth -- than others. This book will help you more than any other book we have found to make an initial pass through the catalogs and concentrate on roses likely to fit your needs. There is no substitute for the experience and advice of local growers and nurseries who have grown roses in your area, but this book will prepare you to inquire and process information from those sources efficiently. If we could own only one rose book, this would be the book.

Although BOTANICA'S ROSES is described as an encyclopedia, the floral entries are more like annotated dictionary entries than encyclopedia articles. Each entry is succinct, ususally a paragraph or two, and contains pertinant information for the rose grower such as recommended growing zone, but I would have liked more information. ROSES is probably relatively exhaustive, that is it lists most of the extant roses. I was able to find information about two roses I purchased at the garden center last year that I could find no where else.I own several other rose books, and find that no one book has all the information I require. For example, I have just purchased a 'Blanc Double De Corbert' rose. BOTANICA'S tells me the rose is a modern, hybrid rugosa, white, repeat flowering. A paragraph of about 100 words in tiny type tells me something about the doubtful heritage of the plant and that it might produce orange-red hips. The entry also lists the growing zones, the parentage prefaced with "possibly" and awards the rose has received. THE ULTIMATE ROSE BOOK by Stirling Macoboy tells me the double white from the village of Corbert in France is a cross between Rosa rugosa and the Tea Rose 'Sombreuil' according to Cochet-Cochet who raised the rose in 1891. the ULTIMATE entry also tells me the flowers rot in wet conditions and there are no hips. SMITH AND HAWKINS 100 OLD ROSES FOR THE AMERICAN GARDEN says 'Blanc Double de Corbert' will grow and thrive under extreme conditions and produce stongly scented blooms with a bumper crop of tomato-rose hips. "All in all this is one tough customer."In THE ORGANIC ROSE GARDEN, Liz Druitt says 'Blanc Double de Corbert' is a hybrid rugosa introduced in 1892 and wonderful for growing in the upper south. It can withstand heat, probably because it has a little Tea blood from it's 'Sombreuil' ancestor. Blanc even works well in partial shade. In fact, she says, it likes a little afternoon shade. And, Blanc produces successive crops of orange-red hips as it blooms all summer.What is the gardener to believe? Well, Macoboy is English and undoubtedly, Blanc, which comes from a warmer dryier area of France does better in a warmer drier climate--not England. These various entries show you cannot hope to grow roses unless you were born with a green thumb and/or can consult more than one reference. BOTANICA'S ROSES is a pretty good reference book for American gardeners attempting to grow roses.

This is the most complete rose book I have ever read because it has pictures for over 4,000 of the roses it describes. You local nursery of course has rose bushes in bloom for your inspection, and the larger mail order nurseries have color catalogs that at least give you an idea of what your rose would look like. But when ordering a unique or lesser-known rose from a smaller source, a catalog description is all that is available to you. This book has clear and beautiful pictures of almost any rose you would consider. My copy of the book also came with a CD, which has all the pictures from the book plus a search tool that lets you sort the pictures by attributes such as color, fragrance, size or awards. I have used the CD even more than the book.

I have grown roses for many years but each year I manage to find room for more so I need a book that will give me a description and photo of the rose I am looking to buy. I use lists of roses to grow in my area from the local rose society. These lists only contain names so I needed to look up their descriptions in my books but I could never find a book that had every rose I needed to look up, invariably I would have to search through several books and even then miss a few. It was so aggrivating, most rose books are small, they cover only a couple hundred which increased the chances that you wouldn't find the rose you wanted in a particular book. FINALLY I have one source to use, everything I need in one book. The photos are numerous and beautiful. The descriptions give you the type of information you need. This book is superb, you will only end up spending the price of this book on numerous smaller books and still be unsatisfied so you might as well get it now. I cant say enough good things about this book, I waited a long time for it.

Botanica's Roses has displaced five books on my desk. It's become the first stop rose reference in our office for dealing with inquiries about roses from overseas. The descriptions are authoritative and the photographs are accurate. With 6,000+ roses listed, chances are that you'll find what you're looking for. The list of contributors reads like an all-star team of rosarians from around the world: Peter Beales - UK (on Wild Roses), Dr. Tommy Cairns - USA(Introduction), Walter Duncan - Australia, Gwen Fagan - South Africa, William Grant - USA, Ken Grapes - UK (on Cultivating Roses), Peter Harkness - UK, Kevin Hughes - Australia, John Mattock - UK (on The Rose and Its Heritage), and David Ruston - Australia.Second only to a good pair of pruners, Botanica's Roses should be considered a must-have by all rose lovers.