Beet

If you've ever wondered what life is like inside the academy, this book is for you. Populated with prima donna faculty members who have never encountered life in the real world and students whose interests involve anything other than learning, it is a hilarious send up on higher education at an old liberal arts college. Read the book with a good dictionary close at hand. The author has discovered some of the most wonderful words ever coined, and it would be a shame to miss the precise meaning of any one of them.

This is the funniest book I've ever read. I was quite shocked to read this, wondering & believing how some colleges may be run now. There is not a moment where this book isn't well thought out & written beautifully as well as intelligently, which other writers have seem to have forgotten lately. You actually believe such a place exists. This being a novel it is amazing how many truths are in it. Obviously D.Turck below has no clue what a well written novel is to save his life. This book will not only hold your interest but make you want to help the rantings of characters Miss Polite & Professor Peace's stuggles. I recommend this book to anyone in or out of college or even thinking about going & not only will you gain some insight into our pitiful educational system but may have you question the very existence of colleges at all! Mr. Rosenblatt you are a genius!

Roger Rosenblatt has taken on Higher Education in this satiric novel. Whereas I found Rosenblatt to be incredibly witty and his bleak view of current day academia to be insightful, I also found the plot to be highly predictable and character development to be incomplete and lacking. First, let me discuss the strengths of the novel. I found that Rosenblatt is highly entertaining at the witty phrase. Names of businesses, clubs, academic courses, etc were indeed funny and did help me stay engaged in the novel. They helped wake me up as I was reading. However, it is the primary themes of the novel that are its strengths. Academia, under pressure from multiple forces, has taken on a business model. Thus the students are the primary customer and courses are taught to entertain and grades are inflated to the point of being meaningless. Rosenblatt points out that the University in its attempts to be universal has become inclusive and post-modern to the point of irrelevance. The university has always had to balance diversity with utility, two forces that can be complimentary or oppositional depending on the strategic insights of the academic leadership. In the case of Beet College, diversity has won but parents are less than amused at courses that are not related to real world experiences and increased opportunity. We all know that esoteric courses may have little 'face' utility but are actually exercises in expansive thought, deliberation with opposing forces, and development of strategic direction. In other words a course on Polynesian poetry and its impact on Irish chapel architecture would have very little immediate utility but in the end it should help teach young people not 'what' to think but 'how' to think. This is the central role of the undergraduate university and Rosenblatt presents a picture where Beet college has lost their direction. The weaknesses of the novel have to do with a highly predictable plot and a novel full of two dimensional characters that never convince the reader to empathize with them. Insane, unstable, and greedy characters are drawn as cartoons - meant to entertain while making minor points. However the stable characters are also cartoonish and two dimensional. Peace Porterfield is a poetry professor who does try to expand the horizons, both emotional and intellectually, of his students. He is tasked with the job of developing a curricula strategy to save the college. He is meant to be the moral center of sanity in the novel but unfortunately he remains too flat. I give Rosenblatt the benefit of the doubt however in that a real fully developed character among a bunch of cartoons would never work, except in a Disney movie, and therefore he makes Peace into an Everyman from a morality play where good and bad are clearly drawn. I did think that Richard Russo's Straight Man was able to convey many of these points while also developing a stronger and more realistic central character. It is Rosenblatt's insights into the pe

This novel joins some other fine skewerings of campus life: Doonesbury's Walden and Jane Smiley's Moo U. The hero, Peace Porterfield, seems to be the only sane and honest character at Beet College (1800 students, 141 faculty, plus administrators and staff). Beet has made an effort to be more relevant to students, with majors in Wiccan History, Little People of Color, Serial Killers of the Northwest, and the like. The college faces a financial crisis, and Portfield is assigned to chair a committee to come up with a new exciting curriculum. There is quite a mix of characters--faculty members (which perhaps should be in quotes), students (I use the term loosely), administrators (very loosely), and others. Campus life is not, shall we say, disciplined. Groups and clubs abound: Christians for Jesus, Up with Goats, Baptists for Fornication, etc. It's an exaggeration of what you'll find on most campuses, in much the same way that Delta House in Animal House was an exaggeration of fraternity life--although I did hear students watching the movie say "Boy! If they had Delta at UT I'd join in an instant!" It's all very madcap. The surrounding town--completely dependent on the college so there is no town-and-gown conflict--must condescend to the college. "Slow Children" street signs have been replaced in an atmosphere of PC-ness by "Please Be Careful As Younger People May Be Entering the Roadway" notices. Beet's President Bollovate is given to lechery and greed--rather like some recent presidents of my own university. There is a plotline, but it really takes a back seat to the descriptions of a totally dysfunctional college. The book does go a bit over the edge. Most parents I know would want to ensure that their kids are getting marketable educational skills for their $40K a year. While there might be a few parents who would shell out those bucks for their child to major in Bondage Studies, I suspect that even fewer students would not be keeping an eye fixed on jobs after graduation. As I tell my own students, you may love poetry, but when you look in the Sunday Classifieds under "Poets Wanted", what do you find? Beet College does have some "ordinary" majors such as Physics, but we never meet any of those students. So Beet College is more like Doonesbury's wonderful Walden, where everything is flaky, and less like Faber College or Smiley's Moo U, which are somewhat more traditional, but where the fun is in the outlandish characters such as Bluto or Lionel Gift. Beet's a good read--fun and bizarre. There but for the Grace of God go I.

In Beet, Roger Rosenblatt, bestselling author of the hilarious novel Lapham Rising (2006), has written another comic gem--a satirical send-up of the college campus. A liberal arts college north of Boston, Beet has mysteriously lost its endowment and may have to close its doors. The villainous Joel Bollovate (think "bloviate"), a shady real-estate dealer, has envious eyes on Beet's 210 prime acres. Idealistic Peace Porterfield, a professor of literature and a decent humanist, is trying to save the college. Wannabe terrorist "Akim ben Laden" (Arthur Horowitz), the only student enrolled in Homeland Security, wants to blow up the school, but has trouble learning how to make a bomb. When not engaged in "fraternizing" with Bollovate, radical feminist poet Matha Polite (rhymes with "elite") hatches various schemes, such as "The Trojan Pig," to disrupt campus life. Beet is a laugh-out-loud yarn, the funniest novel I've read in many moons; but it transcends mere slapstick comedy. In addition to the devilishly funny wit of this uproarious satire, Rosenblatt has crafted a serious story woven through with intelligence and sensitivity. Mark Twain is often quoted as saying, "The difference between the right word and almost the right word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug." Actually, he really said, "The difference between the almost right word & the right word is really a large matter--it's the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning." And, as in Twain's analogy, Rosenblatt has the uncanny ability to select precisely the right word, the lightning rather than the lightning bug. On reading Beet, one senses the ghosts of Jane Austen and Mark Twain hovering near. Do yourself a favor, and ready this book!