Artificial Intelligence: Modern Approach

Until recently, my Algorithms book was my favorite text book ever. However, AI: A Modern Approach has supplanted it. This book is the most thoughtfully designed, easily understandable, clear text I've ever used in over 28 years of attending schools. I really knew nothing about AI when I took my first grad class in AI, but this book, along with a pretty great instructor, has been a wonderful resource, more than any other book I've used. I have not need to google for more information or speak to the professor. The answers are here--clear and concrete. Have no fear and trust this book!

Thanks to all those who reviewed the first edition.If you are reading this, you will probably want thesecond edition instead. It was published Dec 20, 2002.Every chapter has been extensively rewritten.Significant new material has been introduced to cover areas such as constraint satisfaction, fast propositionalinference, planning graphs, internet agents, exactprobabilistic inference, Markov Chain Monte Carlotechniques, Kalman filters, ensemble learning methods,statistical learning, probabilistic natural languagemodels, probabilistic robotics, and ethical aspects of AI.For more information, see aima.cs.berkeley.edu

Russell and Norvig's AI: A Modern Approach is THE best AI text out there. At 932 pages it is encyclopedic, it has nearly everything. So what is missing? How could it be improved? Probably the worst thing about the book is the binding. I am not sure that you can read it from cover to cover without some pages coming loose. Perhaps its the length. Perhaps it needs to be split into two volumes. I am not a fan of pseudocode and all the algorithms are in pseudocode. I think the right compromise between detailed practical code and tutorial compactness is something like the code in Jackson's text Expert Systems. I realize this might make a long book even longer but I still think some examples in Lisp, Prolog, etc. would be an improvement. There are a few things missing. Some detail on case-based reasoning is needed and some newer topics like hybrid systems and rough sets. Also, more on parallel computing for AI. Occasionally I was annoyed by the references. On page 27 the authors attribute a story to Heckerman's 1991 thesis. The thesis contains no such story. The reference should have been to a private communication. By now you might think I hate the book. No. I am suggesting improvements. I repeat. It is THE BEST SINGLE AI TEXT IN PRINT. But you will not be able to teach the whole book in a single AI course. Not even a two semester course.