A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare: 1599

What is wonderful about this book, is that the thesis is very academic, as is the thinking behind it, but the book is marvelously accessible to the general reader! Shapiro's thesis is that the public events of 1599 (The Irish Rebellion, the fall of Essex, the fear of a second Armada, and the nearing succession of Eliz. I - of which it was treasonous to speak) and the events in the personal/professional life of WS (the new theater, the loss of his popular comic actor, the unauthorized publication of his poems and the aquisition of his family coat of arms) joined to make WS not just a talented playwright, but the best of all times. Shapiro uses WS text and to illustrate his points. He shows one of the unauthorized poems side by side with the version WS eventually published. The later one, with very little change in words has tremendous change in meaning, rendering the first, a sloppy and cynical sentiment, and the second a seasoned and honest tribute. Similarly he takes lines of the 1599 plays, to show us their relevance to the times. Among the simple things that we moderns would never note is in Julius Ceasar, Brutus, asks about the calendar. Moderns would relate this only to the soothsayer's prediction about the Ides of March, Elizbethans to their calindrical confusions with with the continent in not having the (Papal) Julian calendar. The descriptions of the times are wonderful. He speculates on how book burning, the climate of fear of a Spanish attack, childhood memories of churches losing their stained glass windows and a trip home could have influenced WS. We see WS browsing in bookstores and riding to Stratford. Shapiro speculates on how much of the fall of Essex was known to WS and the general public. This is an amazing book. I'd love to take a course from Prof. Shapiro! Thank you to the author!

I can't add much to the very positive reviews already posted, except to add that this is a marvelous book and I wish it had been written 30 years ago. The professor I had in college who taught Shakespeare left me with a bad taste in my mouth, such that my personal rediscovery of Shakespeare was long delayed. What distanced me from Shakespeare was the ahistorical approach. The lack of biographical detail (and even the big items are hotly contested) left only the "artistic genius" explanation of the character and personality of the author of the plays. Genuis there is, but nine-tenths of inspiration is perspiration and I never could grasp what made him sweat. Shapiro painstakingly explicates the hot issues of the times and positions the author and his work in that framework. It is reassuring that from the ever-changing matter of the every day world something like a lasting art can be fashioned.

Two rather obvious conclusions leap off the pages of just about every book ever written about William Shakespeare: That his plays reflect the turbulent times in which he lived, and that very little is known for certain about his life. James Shapiro, a much respected Shakespeare scholar and professor at Columbia University, has applied his enormous fund of Shakespearean knowledge and his zeal for historical research to these home truths in a novel way. He narrows his focus down to a single year in Shakespeare's life and teases out of the four plays that occupied the Bard in that year a number of stimulating conclusions. As a feat of sheer scholarly research, Shapiro's book is a mind-boggling performance -- his bibliography runs to 41 pages --- and his conclusions, while obviously personal and open to debate, will make readers go back to those four plays equipped with new tools for decoding them. In 1599 Shakespeare finished "Henry the Fifth," wrote "Julius Caesar" and "As You Like It," and shaped his first version of "Hamlet" --- four truly great plays. He was also involved in the construction of the Globe Theater (of which he was part owner) and busy acting on its stage. Offstage noises in his life (though very much onstage for most Englishmen) were the ill-fated English expedition to subdue a rebellion in Ireland, the threat of invasion from a second Spanish Armada, a host of intrigues and plots at the court of Queen Elizabeth, England's attempt to shoulder its way into the lucrative East Indies trade, and even his own domestic affairs back home in Stratford. Dealing with all this gives Shapiro's book a divided focus. Those whose main concern is the four plays (doubtless a majority of his readers) may be impatient with the length and detail Shapiro devotes to the Irish venture and the Spanish threat in particular. There is no convenient critical pigeonhole into which to thrust this book. Call it literary criticism against a historical background. What's important is that Shapiro's perceptive research and fluent writing style make the mixture work nicely. Of the four plays, "Henry the Fifth" is the one least esteemed by critics today. Shapiro investigates its sources and shows how it reflected England's uneasiness about the Earl of Essex and his expedition against Ireland. He concludes that it is neither pro- nor anti-war, but is rather a play about "going to war," a war that Shakespeare's audience felt was "both unavoidable and awful." "Julius Caesar" he sees as a clever blending of religious and political concerns then prevalent in English society. He finds "Hamlet" remarkable for many reasons beyond its sheer greatness as literature. Here, Shapiro says, Shakespeare brought a new depth and style to the stage soliloquy, a form he finds based on the then-new art of the personal prose essay. For Shapiro, Hamlet is a man who "needs to talk, but there is nobody in whom he can confide" --- except his audience. Shapiro is also captivated by Shak

I routinely read every book on Shakespeare that comes out. Most of them -- such as Will of the World -- speculate about this elusive figure without adding much to what we already know Shapiro's book is different It's a brilliant insight to add to the two main traditions of biographical studies of S -- his life as a working actor/manager and the intellectual roots of his plays plus the hints they give of his life and beliefs. Shapiro embeds S the playwright in the politics of his age, particularly Elizabeth's reign coming to an end, the Earl of Essex as a potential rebel, the alarms about a possible new Spanish Armada, and the latent underground Catholic opposition to the new regime that had broken up the rhythms and traditions of conservative England. He makes S the observer much more a man of his era than most comparable books. He offers many insights into the time and S's place in it. For me, there is only one test of a book on Shakespeare: does it send you back to reread the plays. This one did. His analysis of Julius Caesar is a significant new slant on the work. He gves me a richer sense of the always active mind of this complex man who was at the same time an intellectual, practical man of business, upward mobile money seeker -- and part of London's milieu. I rate this as an outstanding new contribution to Shakespeare studies

This wonderful book will be a classic. It combines specific new historical information discovered by Shapiro's original research--yes, new information can still be found on Shakespeare!--with an insightful reading of the great plays he wrote just before, during, and immediately after his annus mirabilis 1599. For those who enjoy juicy, well-researched historical detail on the Bard's life and times (such as Frank Kermode's -The Age of Shakespeare-), Shapiro goes to the next level in this book. He depicts Shakespeare's life as he lived it during one momentous year, 1599, a decision that is not arbitrary. Shapiro's close focus on that year succeeds in illuminating much about Shakespeare's imagination that was previously obscure. And what a year it was--producing the break-through plays Henry V, Julius Caesar, As You Like It, and Hamlet. Shapiro describes how the year began as Shakespeare and his co-investors surreptitiously and hurriedly worked to save their financial investment by dismantling a theatre building on a site where they had lost their lease, in order to rebuild it as The Globe on the south side of the Thames. Shapiro then explains better than I have read anywhere else the nature of Shakespeare's relationship with the Court of Queen Elizabeth, and how his performances before the Queen and his understanding of the royal taste affected his decisions when he wrote his plays. Shapiro provides fresh insight into how Shakespeare's financial prospects and artistic choices that year were interwoven with the rising, and then the plummeting, fate of Robert Devereaux, the tragic Earl of Essex. Forgotten events like the second Spanish Armada (which never materialised), and the English campaign to subjugate Ireland (which failed miserably) were of critical importance to the mood of England that year, and Shapiro shows how these events, almost or entirely forgotten today, exerted a powerful influence on Shakespeare's imagination. Best of all, Shapiro connnects Shakespeare's development of the soliloquy with his reading of Montaigne's Essays, and he convincingly demonstrates how in 1599 Shakespeare invented what we think of as "Shakespearean" tragedy when he realised that Montaigne's literary innovation could be an instrument for depicting the inner consciousness of a character on the stage. Shapiro's reading of Hamlet is as illuminating as Harold Bloom's can be, without Bloom's metaphysical blather. Shapiro also shows how the period marked the decline of the over-ripe chivalric ideals (embodied by Essex) of the English aristocratic class, and contrasts this with the rise of adventurous English merchant capitalists, signalled by the founding of The East India Company, a momentous event in the early development of what was to become the British Empire. Shapiro points out how this development transferred the initiative from knightly hot-heads like Essex and Raliegh to cool, sober, merchants who were about to produce centuries of successes. He s