A House Divided: Bridging the Generation Gap in Your Church

I understand how reviewer Rodboomboom arrived at his conclusions in his review above. However, I think he missed the point of the book entirely. Is a hymn holy and sacred because of its style or because of the words in it? If you answer that a hymn is sacred because of its style then you will agree with Rodboomboom's review of this book. However, if you understand a hymn to be sacred because of the words of the hymn, not the style, then you will understand the true value and meaning of this book. Lets say that 5 composers decide to write a song using the exact same wording from John 3:16. Each of them uses a different style of music (hymn, country, classical, rock, and rap) but the wording is identical. Which version of John 3:16 would you listen to? Personally I would not listen to the rap version. That style of music is almost totally repulsive to me. So if someone were to try to present John 3:16 to me using the "rap" version I would not listen. Why? Because I reject the message of John 3:16? NO!!! I reject the form the message came to me. Put John 3:16 in a hymn, classical or rock version and I'm listening (like rap, I wouldn't listen to the country version either). Am I wrong for not listening to John 3:16 in a country or rap version? Am I refusing to hear "sound doctrine" if I won't listen to it in these forms? The problem that many churches have today is that they offer John 3:16 only in the "rap" version (OK, not specifically but follow the illustration here). And the people often view my not coming to their church as my rejection of the gospel. They may also believe that the "rap" version of John 3:16 is God's version of 3:16. Let's be honest folks, how many times do you choose to listen to a radio station that plays music you don't like? Why do churches demand every generation to like the gospel packaged in a way that one generation has dictated as God's way? And I'm not talking about taking communion with soda and potato chips. The message of the Gospel can remain the same even though its delivery is different. I don't preach in the same language as the Apostles did. Am I compromising the message or not being "subservient to Christ's desires?" Am I not "under Christ's leadership" because I no longer use those languages? The form can and should change. The message should remain the same. This book teaches how to present the unchanging Gospel in a way that people will want to listen and in a way they can understand (I don't understand what most rap songs are saying). It does not teach how to dilute the Gospel message so that those not wanting to listen will (2 Tim 4). It does teach us how to become all things to all people that we might save some (1 Cor. 9:22). It teaches us to be a church that is not biased to the ways and preferences of one generation (even though that generation may believe their way is the right way). This is a great book for those concerned about reaching all people (regardless of their generational differe

Bob Whitesel and Kent Hunter in "A House Divided" have addressed the difficult issue that has divided the church for many years. They have taken the information we have known for some while about the three generations addressed in the book and applied that information in creative ways to bridge-building over the generational gaps. Their concept of the Tri-Generational Church as a holistic congregation offers much needed hope to the body of Christ in our time. They provide practical descriptions of the necessary leadership style and worship that will work in the Tri-Gen Church. This book is touching a nerve in the church and will make a positive thrust for the outreach and mission of the church. Wm. Leroy Wise, Pastor of Calvary United Methodist Church, Syracuse, IN